El papel de las emociones en una visita de adolescentes al Acuario de Río de Janeiro
Palabras clave:
educación no formal, experiencia emocional, interacciones, emocionesResumen
Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación cualitativa y exploratoria sobre las impresiones y reacciones emocionales de cinco grupos de adolescentes de escuelas públicas que visitaron el Acuario de Río de Janeiro (AquaRio), Brasil. Los datos audiovisuales se analizaron con un software de análisis cualitativo, a partir de descriptores de emociones estandarizados, y se examinaron desde una perspectiva sociocultural en la que las emociones se organizan en tres categorías: i) emociones relacionadas con la experiencia de la actividad; ii) emociones relacionadas con el proceso de aprendizaje de las ciencias; y iii) emociones relacionadas con interacciones sociales, culturales y de valores. Los resultados indican que la visita a AquaRio proporcionó a los adolescentes experiencias emocionales ricas y variadas, como se revela en la consistencia de sus respuestas emocionales. La alta ocurrencia de descriptores de emociones valoradas positivamente revela que la experiencia de la visita se caracterizó en gran medida por la apreciación, el reconocimiento de la diversidad de especies y el apego emocional por los animales marinos, con evidencia de que las emociones dirigieron la atención, las experiencias de aprendizaje y la motivación.Descargas
Citas
Aalto, S., Wallius, E., Naatanen, P., Hiltunen, J., Metsahonkala, L., Sipila, H. et al. (2005). Regression analysis utilizing subjective evaluation of emotional experience in PET studies on emotions. Brain Research Protocols, 15(3), 142-154.
Adelman, L. M., Falk, J. H. e James, S. (2000). Impact of National Aquarium in Baltimore on Visitors' Conservation Attitudes, Behavior, and Knowledge. Curator, 43(1), 33–61.
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. Em G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley e K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations In Museums (259-303), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Alsop, S. e Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043–1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052180.
AquaRio (2019). O Aquário. Disponível em: https://www.aquariomarinhodorio.com.br/o-aquario/.
Ash, D., Crain, R., Brandt, C., Loomis, M., Wheaton, M. e Bennett, C. (2007). Talk, tools, and tensions: Observing biological talk over time. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1581–1602.
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K. e Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environ Educ Res, 13(3), 367-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604.
Barbas, T. A., Paraskevopoulos, S. e Stamou, A. G. (2009). The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: A case study. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 61-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759943.
Barmpas, T., S., P. e Stamou, A. (2009). The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: A case study. Learning, Media & Technology, 34, 61–69.
Bellocchi, A. (2017). Interaction Ritual Approaches to Emotion and Cognition in Science Learning Experiences. Em A. Bellocchi, C. Quigley e K. Otrel-Cass (Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research. Cultural Studies of Science Education (85-105). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0_5.
Briseño-Garzón, A. (2005). Adult learning experiences from an aquarium visit: The on-site and longitudinal roles of personal agendas and social interactions in family groups (Dissertação de mestrado). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Cesário, V., Coelho, A. e Nisi, V. (2017). Teenagers as Experience Seekers Regarding Interactive Museums Tours. International Conference on Design and Digital Communication. Barcelos.
Clayton, S., Fraser, J. e Saunders, C. (2009). Zoo Experiences: Conversations, Connections, and Concern for Animals. Zoo Biology, 28, 377–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20186.
Coelho, P. (2019). A visita ao AquaRio a partir do olhar de grupos de adolescentes (Trabalho de conclusão de curso). Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro.
Creswell, J. W. e Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
Dierking, L. D. (2013). Museums as Social Learning Spaces. Museums – Social Learning Spaces and Knowledge Producing Processes, 198–219.
Falk, J. H. e Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington DC: Whalesback Books.
Falk, J. H. e Dierking, L. D. (2010). School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98 (November-December), 486–493.
Falk, J. H. e Gillespie, K. L. (2009b). Investigating the role of emotion in science center visitor learning. Visitor Studies, 12(2), 112–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570903203414.
Falk, J. e Adelman, L. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 163–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10070.
Falk, J. e Needham, M. (2013). Factors Contributing to Adult Knowledge of Science and Technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 431–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21080.
Fortus, D. (2014). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821–835. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21155.
Glăveanu, V. P. e Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the Creator’s Eyes: Using the Subjective Camera to Study Craft Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 152–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677293.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0.
Hilke, D. D. (1988). Chapter 12: Strategies for family learning in museums. Visitor Studies, 1(1), 120–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578809445746.
Humaine (2008). Humaine Emotion Annotation and Representation Language. Disponível em: https://web.archive.org/web/20080411092724/http://emotion-research.net/projects/humaine/earl.
Ingold, T. (2011): Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336.
Jensen, E. (2012). Critical Review of Conservation Education and Engagement Practices in European Zoos and Aquaria. Coventry: University of Warwick.
Kasper, G. e Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics. In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014.
Lahlou, S. (2011). How can we capture the subject’s perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50(3–4), 607–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411411033
Martin, A. J., Durksen, T. L., Williamson, D., Kiss, J. e Ginns, P. (2016). The role of a museum-based science education program in promoting content knowledge and science motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1364–1384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21332.
Massarani, L., Mucci Poenaru, L., Norberto Rocha, J., Rowe, S. e Falla, S. (2019b). Adolescents learning with exhibits and explainers: the case of Maloka. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 253-267
Massarani, L., Norberto Rocha, J., Mucci Poenaru, L., Bravo, M., Singer, S. e Sánchez, E. (2020). O olhar dos adolescentes em uma visita ao Museo Interactivo de Economía (MIDE), México. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad —CTS, 15(44),173-195.
Massarani, L., Reznik, G., Rocha, J. N., Falla, S., Rowe, S., Martins, A. D. e Amorim, L. H. (2019). A Experiência De Adolescentes Ao Visitar Um Museu De Ciência: Um Estudo No Museu Da Vida. Ensaio Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências (Belo Horizonte), 21, 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172019210115.
Myers Jr, O., Saunders, C. e Bexell, S. (2009). Fostering empathy with wildlife: Factors affecting free-choice learning for conservation concern and behavior. Free-Choice Learning and the Environment, 39–55.
Myers, O. E., Saunders, C. D. e Birjulin, A. A. (2004). An Experience Sampling Study Building on Insights from Psychology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 299–321.
Nakasone, A., Prendinger, H. e Ishizuka, M. (2005). Emotion Recognition from Electromyography and Skin Conductance. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Biosignal Interpretation (BSI-05), Tokyo.
National Research Council (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12190.
NEMO (2021). Emotions and learning in museums. Berlin: The Network of European Museum Organizations.
Neves, R. e Massarani, L. (2016). O olhar das crianças sobre uma exposição interativa. Em L. Massarani, R. Neves e L. Amorim (Orgs.), Divulgação científica e museus de ciências: o olhar do visitante - Memórias do evento. Rio de Janeiro: Museu da Vida/Casa de Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz e RedPop.
OECD (2018): Social and Emotional Skills 33. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/UPDATED Social and Emotional Skills - Well-being, connectedness and success.pdf (website).pdf
Packer, J. (2008). Beyond Learning: Exploring Visitors’ Perceptions of the Value and Benefits of Museum Experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 33–54. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00293.x.
Parkinson, B. (2012). Ideas and Realities of Emotion. Routledge.
Pekrun, R. e Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. Educational Psychology Handbook Series. International handbook of emotions in education (120–141). Nova York: Routledge/Taylor e Francis Group.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T. e Perry, R. P. (2007). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: An Integrative Approach to Emotions in Education. Emotion in Education (13–36). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., Barchfeld, P. e Perry, R. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
Perakyla, A. e Sorjonen, M.-L. (2012). Emotion in Interaction. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.001.0001.
Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344-350.
Posner, J., Russell, J. A. e Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340.
Rae Westbury, H. e Neumann, D. L. (2008). Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biological Psychology, 78(1), 66-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.009.
Rennie, L. J. e Mc Clafferty, T. P. (1996). Science centres and science learning. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 53–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560078.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. Em J. V. Wertsch, P. del Río e A. Alvarez (Eds.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational aspects. Sociocultural studies of mind (139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008.
Rowe, S. e Kisiel, J. (2012). Family Engagement at Aquarium Touch Tanks—Exploring Interactions and the Potential for Learning. Em E. Davidsson e A. Jakobsson (Eds), Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rowe, S., Massarani, L., Gonçalves, W. S., Luz, R. V. e Rocha, J. N. (2021). Emotion in informal learning as mediated action: cultural, interpersonal and personal lenses (Manuscrito submetido para publicação).
Russell, J., Weiss, A. e Mendelsohn, G. (1989). Affect Grid: A Single-Item Scale of Pleasure and Arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493.
Sadler, T. D. e Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042.
Schänzel, H. e McIntosh, A. (2010). An Insight into the Personal and Emotive Context of Wildlife Viewing at the Penguin Place, Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, February 1, 36–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667348.
Schröder, M. et al. (2007). What should a generic emotion markup language be able to represent? Em A. C. R. Paiva, R. Prada e R. W. Picard (Eds.), Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (440–451). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_39.
Staus, N. L. e Falk, J. H. (2017). The Role of Emotion in Informal Science Learning: Testing an Exploratory Model. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(2), 45–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12139.
Staus, N. (2012). Crossing the Cartesian Divide: An Investigation into the Role of Emotion in Science Learning (Tese de doutorado). Oregon: Oregon State University.
Teixeira dos Santos, F. M. e Mortimer, E. F. (2003). How emotions shape the relationship between a chemistry teacher and her high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1095–1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052216.
Wagensberg, J. (2000). Principios fundamentales de la museología científica moderna. Alambique: Didáctica de Las Ciencias Experimentales, 26 (Octubre-Diciembre), 15-19. Dísponivel em: http://hdl.handle.net/11162/21503.
Westbury, R. e Neumann, D. (2008). Empathy-related responses to movie film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biological Psychology, 78, 66–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.009.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L. e Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048.
Zeppel, H. e Muloin, S. (2008). Conservation Benefits of Interpretation on Marine Wildlife Tours. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 280-294.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todos los números de CTS y sus artículos individuales están bajo una licencia CC-BY.
Desde 2007, CTS proporciona un acceso libre, abierto y gratuito a todos sus contenidos, incluidos el archivo completo de su edición cuatrimestral y los diferentes productos presentados en su plataforma electrónica. Esta decisión se sustenta en la creencia de que ofrecer un acceso libre a los materiales publicados ayuda a un mayor y mejor intercambio del conocimiento.
A su vez, para el caso de su edición cuatrimestral, la revista permite a los repositorios institucionales y temáticos, así como también a las web personales, el auto-archivo de los artículos en su versión post-print o versión editorial, inmediatamente después de la publicación de la versión definitiva de cada número y bajo la condición de que se incorpore al auto-archivo un enlace a la fuente original.
