New technologies: for whom?

The case of nanotechnology

Authors

  • Guillermo Boido Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Celia T. Baldatti Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-669

Keywords:

technoscience, accessibility of technology, social exclusion, precautionary principle, nanotechnology

Abstract

The article presents some reflections about the implications and consequences of the growing relevance of the activities known generally as “technoscience”. Such activities contribute substantially to the solidification of a model of social and economic organization that segregates wide sectors of the population from its benefits, and at the same time endangers the sustainability of the planet. The items that we examine are: a) the diffusion and accessibility of these technologies among diverse social sectors; b) the bases for legitimacy alleged by those who favor the uncritical acceptation of the scientific and technical advances; and c) the role that scientific and technical institutions should play so that these practices serve a genuinely democratic society. This article analyzes the case of the present developments in the field of nanotechnology in the aforementioned aspects. Although there is at present an important consensus among specialists that nanotechnology will be a crucial factor for the solution of the serious problems originated by the social exclusion affecting a great part of the planet, this world of promises must be set beside another world, one that refers to the possibility that this new technology be dangerously employed towards less altruistic ends.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guillermo Boido, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Profesor Titular de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales.

Asociación de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia del Cono Sur (AFHIC).

Celia T. Baldatti, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Profesora Adjunta de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales.

Asociación de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia del Cono Sur (AFHIC). 

References

CEZAR, F. G. y ABRANTES, P. C. (2003): “Princípio da precaução: considerações epistemológicas sobre o princípio e sua relação com o processo de análise de risco”, Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia,nº 20, pp. 225-262.

COMEST (World Commission on the Ethics of Science and Technology) (2005): The precautionary principle,París, UNESCO.

DELGADO RAMOS, G. C. (2004): “Promesas y peligros de la Nanotecnología”, Nómadas: revista crítica de ciencias sociales y jurídicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Disponible en: www.ucm.es/info/nomadas/9/giandelgado.htm.

FEYNMAN, R. (1960): “There’s plenty of room at the bottom”, Engineering and Science,vol. 23, nº 5, febrero, pp. 22-36.

IFCS (Intergovernmental Forum for Chemical Safety) (2008): Final Report. Sixth Session of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety, Dakar, Senegal. Disponible en: www.who.int/ifcs/documents/forums/forum6/f6_finalreport_en.doc.

IPEN (International Pops Elimination Network) (2010): Breves antecedentes sobre nanotecnología y nanomateriales.Disponible en: www.ipen.org/ipenweb/work/nano/ ipennano_%2520kingston_background_spanish.pdf.

KATZ, C. (2009): “Crisis global II: Las tendencias de la etapa”, La página de Claudio Katz, 2 de diciembre. Disponible en: lahaine.org/katz/index.php?p=183&c=1.

LADRIÈRE, J. (1978): El reto de la racionalidad,Salamanca, Sígueme/UNESCO.

NACIONES UNIDAS: Informe Anual del año 2008 de Naciones Unidas sobre los Objetivos del Milenio. Disponible en: www.un.org/spanish/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG _Report_2008_SPANISH.pdf.

PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA EL DESARROLLO (PNUD) (2005): Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2005.Disponible en hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR05 _sp_complete.pdf.

STRATEGIC APPROACH TO INTERNATIONAL CHEMICALS MANAGEMENT (SAICM) (2009): Información básica sobre las nuevas cuestiones normativas en relación con la nanotecnología y los nanomateriales manufacturados,25 de marzo. Disponible en: www.saicm.org/documents/iccm/ICCM2/meeting%20documents/ ICCM2%20INF34%20nano%20background%20S.pdf.

TESTART, J. & GODIN, C. (2001): El racismo del gen, Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING (2004): Nanoscience and nanotechnologies. Disponible en: royalsociety.org/Nanoscience- and-nanotechnologies-opportunities-and-uncertainties-/.

UNESCO (1999): Declaración sobre la ciencia y el uso del saber científico,World Conference on Science, Budapest. Disponible en: unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/ 001163/116341So.pdf.

UNESCO (2000): Declaración del Milenio.Disponible en: www.un.org/spanish/milenio /ares552.pdf.

UNESCO (2007): Ética y política de la nanotecnología. Disponible en: unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001459/145951s.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-30

How to Cite

Boido, G., & Baldatti, C. T. . (2012). New technologies: for whom? : The case of nanotechnology. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 7(21), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-669

Issue

Section

Articles