Homo faber revisitado: posfenomenología y teoría del compromiso materia

Don Idhe, Lambros Malafouris

Resumen


El trabajo original fue publicado en inglés en junio de 2019 en Philosophy & Technology (volumen 32, número 2, pp. 195-214) y está disponible aquí: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7. Este artículo se distribuye bajo los términos de la Licencia de Atribución 4.0 Internacional de Creative Commons (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es), que permite el uso, la distribución y la reproducción irrestrictos en cualquier medio, siempre que se otorgue apropiado crédito al autor o los autores originales y a la fuente, se proporcione un enlace a la licencia de Creative Commons y se indique si se han realizado cambios, que en este caso se limitan a la traducción del inglés realizada por Luciano Mascaró, investigador de CONICET y docente en la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Arnold, D. E. (2018). Maya Potters’ indigenous knowledge: cognition, engagement, and practice. University Press of Colorado.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bergson, H. (1998 [1911]). Creative evolution (tr., Arthur Mitchell). Nueva York: Dover.

Bentley-Condit, V. K. & Smith, E. O. (2010). Animal tool use: current definitions and an updated comprehensive catalog. Behaviour, 147, 185–221.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bril, B., Parry, R. & Dietrich, G. (2015). How similar are nut-cracking and stone-flaking? a functional approach to percussive technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370(1682), 20140355.

Bruineberg, J. & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599.

Botin, L., Forss, A., Funk, M., Hasse, C., Irwin, S. O., Lally, R. & Whyte, K. P. (2015). Technoscience and postphenomenology: the Manhattan papers. Lexington Books.

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Clowes, R. (2015). Thinking in the cloud: the cognitive incorporation of cloud-based technology. Philosophy and Technology, 28(2), 261–296.

Clowes, R. W. (2018). Immaterial engagement: human agency and the cognitive ecology of the Internet. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9560-4.

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

de la Torre, I. (2011). The origins of stone tool technology in Africa: a historical perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0350.

De Preester, H. (2011). Technology and the body: the (im)possibilities of re-embodiment. Foundations of Science, 16(2), 119–137.

De Preester, H. & Tsakiris, M. (2009). Body-extension versus body-incorporation: is there a need for a body-model? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 307–319.

Friis, J. & Crease, R. (2016). Technoscience and Postphenomenology. The Manhattan Papers. Lexington.

Fuentes, A. (2016). The extended evolutionary synthesis, ethnography, and the human niche: toward an integrated anthropology. Current Anthropology, 57(S13), S000–S000.

Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.

Garofoli, D. (2016). Metaplasticities: material engagement meets mutational enhancement”. En G. Etzelmüller & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment in evolution and culture (307–335). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Gosden, C. & Malafouris, L. (2015). Process archaeology (P-Arch). World Archaeology, 47(5), 1–17.

Gibbons, A. (2016). Why humans are the high-energy apes. Science, 352(6286), 639–639.

Haslam, M., Hernandez-Aguilar, A., Ling, V., Carvalho, S., de la Torre, I., DeStefano, A., Du, A., Hardy, B., Harris, J., Marchant, L., Matsuzawa, T., McGrew, W., Mercarder, J., Mora, R., Petraglia, M., Roche, H., Visalberghi, E. & Warren, R. (2009). Primate Archaeology. Nature, 460, 339–344.

Harmand, S., Lewis, J. E., Feibel, C. S., Lepre, C. J., Prat, S., Lenoble, A., Boës, X. et al. (2015). 3.3-million- year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 521, 310–315.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The human advantage: a new understanding of how our brain became remarkable. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hutchins, E. (2008). The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 2011– 2019.

Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 705–715.

Hutchins, E. (2011). Enculturating the supersized mind. Philosophical Studies, 152, 437–446.

Hutto, D. & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism: basic minds without content. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (2008). Aging: I don’t want to be a cyborg! Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 397– 404.

Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: the Peking University lectures. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.

Ihde, D. (2012). Postphenomenological re-embodiment. Foundations of Science, 17, 373–377.

Ihde, D. (2015). Acoustic technics. Lexington.

Ihde, D. (2016). Husserl’s missing technologies. Oxford University Press.

Ihde, D. (2018). Should philosophies have shelf lives. Journal of the Dialectics of Nature., 1(40), 1–6.

Ingold, T. (2004). Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world. Social Anthropology, 12(2), 209–221.

Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 427–442.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Londres: Routledge.

Ingold, T. & Pálsson, G. (Eds.). (2013). Biosocial becomings: integrating social and biological anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Iliopoulos, A. (2016). The material dimensions of signification: rethinking the nature and emergence of semiosis in the debate on human origins. Quaternary International, 405, Part A (the material dimensions of cognition), 111–124.

Iliopoulos, A. (2017). The evolution of material signification: tracing the origins of symbolic body ornamentation through a pragmatic and enactive theory of cognitive semiotics. Signs and Society, 4(2), 244–277.

Iliopoulos, A. & Garofoli, D. (2016). The material dimensions of cognition: re-examining the nature and emergence of the human mind. Quaternary International, 405, Part A (The material dimensions of cognition), 1–7.

Knappett, C. (2005). Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (Eds.). (2008a). Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Nueva York: Springer.

Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008b). Material and nonhuman agency: an introduction. En C. Knappet & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach (ix-xix). Nueva York: Springer.

Kivell, T. L. (2015). Evidence in hand: recent discoveries and the early evolution of human manual manipulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 370, 20150105.

Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38, 103–131.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. En W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (225–259). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: how culture made the human mind. Princeton University Press.

Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., et al. (2014). Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature, 514(7521), 161.

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–146.

Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(9), 2640–2648.

Lycett, S. J. & Gowlett, J. A. J. (2008). On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology, 40(3), 295–315.

Malafouris, L. (2004). The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. En E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (53–62). Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Malafouris, L. (2008a). Between brains, bodies and things: tectonoetic awareness and the extended self. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 363, 1993–2002.

Malafouris, L. (2008b). Beads for a plastic mind: the ‘blind man’s stick’ (BMS) hypothesis and the active nature of material culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 401–414.

Malafouris, L. (2008c). At the Potter’s wheel: an argument for material agency. En C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric perspective (19–36). New York: Springer.

Malafouris, L. (2009). ‘Neuroarchaeology’: exploring the links between neural and cultural plasticity. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 251–259.

Malafouris, L. (2010a). Metaplasticity and the human becoming: principles of neuroarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 88, 49–72.

Malafouris, L. (2010b). Knapping intentions and the marks of the mental. En L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind (13–22). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Malafouris, L. (2010c). Grasping the concept of number: how did the sapient mind move beyond approximation? En C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), The archaeology of measurement: Comprehending heaven, earth and time in ancient societies (35–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2011). Enactive discovery: the aesthetic of material engagement. En R. Manzotti (Ed.), Situated aesthetics: Art beyond the skin (123–141). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

Malafouris, L. (2012a). Prosthetic gestures: how the tool shapes the mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 28–29.

Malafouris, L. (2012b). Linear B as distributed cognition: excavating a mind not limited by the skin. En J. Jensen, M. Jessen, & N. Johannsen (Eds.), Excavating the Mind: Cross-sections through culture, cognition and materiality (69–84). Dinamarca: University of Aarhus.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Malafouris, L. (2014). Creative thinging: the feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics and Cognition, 22(1), 140– 158.

Malafouris, L. (2015). Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind, 8(4), 351– 371.

Malafouris, L. (2016a). On human becoming and incompleteness: a material engagement approach to the study of embodiment in evolution and culture. En G. Etzelmüller & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment in evolution and culture (289–305). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Malafouris, L. (2016b). “Material engagement and the embodied mind”. T. Wynn & F. L. Coolidge (Eds.), Cognitive models in Palaeolithic archaeology (69–82). Oxford University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2016c). “Hylonoetics: on the priority of material engagement”. K. Grigoriadis (Eds) Mixed Matters: A Multi-Material Design Compendium (140–146). Jovis Verlag.

Malafouris, L. (2018). Bringing things to mind: 4Es and Material Engagement. En A. Newen, L. de Bruin & G. Shaun (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (755–771). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Malafouris, L. & Renfrew, C. (2008). Steps to a ‘neuroarchaeology’ of mind: an introduction. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 381–385.

Malafouris, L. & Renfrew, C. (2010). An introduction to the cognitive life of things: archaeology, material engagement and the extended mind. En L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: recasting the boundaries of the mind (1–12). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Malafouris, L. & Koukouti, M. D. (2017). More than a body. En C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction (289–303). Oxford University Press.

March, P. L. (2017). Playing with clay and the uncertainty of agency. A material engagement theory perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–19.

Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee: apes, people, and their genes. Univ of California Press.

McLuhan, M. (1994 [1964]). Understanding media: the extensions of man. MIT press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962 [1945]). Phenomenology of Perception. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: how Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miller, D. (Ed.). (1998). Material cultures: why some things matter. University of Chicago Press.

Noble, W. & Davidson, I. (1996). Human evolution, language and mind: a psychological and archaeological inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Overmann, K. A. (2016a). Materiality in numerical cognition: Material Engagement Theory and the counting technologies of the Ancient Near East. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Overmann, K. A. (2016b). The role of materiality in numerical cognition. Quaternary International, 405, 42–51.

Overmann, K. A. (2017). Thinking materially: cognition as extended and enacted. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 17(3–4), 354–373.

Overmann, K. A. & Wynn, T. (2018). Materiality and human cognition. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1–22.

Poulsgaard, K. S. (2017). Enactive individuation: technics, temporality and affect in digital design and fabrication. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–18.

Poulsgaard, K. S. & Malafouris, L. (2017). Models, mathematics and materials in digital architecture. Cognition beyond the brain (283–304). Springer International Publishing.

Renfrew, C. (2004). Towards a theory of material engagement. En E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (23–31). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Renfrew, C., Frith, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008). Introduction. The sapient mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 363, 1935–1938.

Rietveld, E. & Brouwers, A. A. (2017). Optimal grip on affordances in architectural design practices: an ethnography. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 545–564.

Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Roberts, P. (2016). ‘We have never been behaviourally modern’: the implications of material engagement theory and metaplasticity for understanding the late Pleistocene record of human behaviour. Quaternary International, 405, 8–20.

Rosenberger, R. (2011). A phenomenology of image use in science: multistability and the debate over Martian gully deposits. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 15(2), 156–169.

Rosenberger, R. (2013). Mediating mars: perceptual experience and scientific imaging technologies. Foundations of Science, 18(1), 75–91.

Rosenberger, R. & Verbeek, P. P. (2015). Postphenomenological investigations: essays on human-technology relations. Lexington Books.

Roux, V. & Brill, B. (Eds.) (2005) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Shew, A. (2017). Animal constructions and technological knowledge. Lexington Books.

Shumaker, R., Walkup, K. & Beck, B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K. D. & Chaminade, T. (2008). Neural correlates of Early Stone Age tool-making: technology, language and cognition in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 363, 1939–1949.

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: the fault of Epimetheus (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.

Suchman, L. (2006). Human-machine reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Tallis, R. (2011). Aping mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Durham: Acumen.

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap: Cambridge.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.

Verbeek, P. P. (2008a). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: a postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26.

Verbeek, P. P. (2008b). Cyborg intentionality: rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 387–395.

Verbeek, P.P. (2011) Moralizing technology. Chicago University Press.

Walls, M. & Malafouris, L. (2016). Creativity as a developmental ecology. En V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (553–566). Palgrave Macmillan.

Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: how cooking made us human. Basic Books.

Whiten, A. (2015). Experimental studies illuminate the cultural transmission of percussive technologies in Homo and Pan. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370(1682), 20140359.

Wheeler, M. & Clark, A. (2008). Culture, embodiment and genes: unravelling the triple helix. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3563–3575.

Wynn, T. (1995). Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeology, 27, 10–24.

Zink, K. D. & Lieberman, D. E. (2016). Impact of meat and lower Palaeolithic food processing techniques on chewing in humans. Nature, 531(7595), 500–503.


Enlaces de Referencia

  • Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Avda. Pueyrredón 538, 2º cuerpo, 2º piso C - C1032ABS -  Ciudad de Buenos Aires, República Argentina

Correo electrónico: revistacts@gmail.com

Sitio web: http://www.revistacts.net

Facebook: Revista Iberoamericana CTS - Twitter: @RevistaCTS