PRESENTATION: Algorithms, Bias, and Gender

Artificial Intelligence and the (In)Visibility of Women Scientists in the Media

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/issn.1850-0013-1257

Abstract

A central feature of this dossier is its focus on Ibero-America and Latin America. It offers a transatlantic perspective that brings together works from our region, which has sociocultural characteristics distinct from those of other regions. Much of the debate on AI, algorithmic bias, and gender has taken place in Anglo-Saxon contexts or at academic institutions that top international rankings. However, gender inequalities, digital divides, media ecosystems, journalistic cultures, science policies, and the ways in which knowledge circulates take on specific forms in Latin America, Spain, and other Ibero-American regions. This territorial and methodological diversity allows us to discuss AI as a set of systems embedded in specific social contexts, rather than as a universal technology with uniform effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carolina Moreno-Castro, University of Valencia

Institute for Social Welfare Policy (POLIBIENESTAR), University of Valencia, Spain.

Teresa Vernal-Vilicic, Andres Bello University

School of Journalism, College of Architecture, Art, Design, and Communications, Andrés Bello University, Chile.

References

Alonso Betanzos, Amparo (2023). Inteligencia artificial y sesgos de género. Gender on Digital: Journal of Digital Feminism, 1, 11-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35869/god.v1i.5060.

Degli-Esposti, Sara (2021). El rol del análisis de género en la reducción de los sesgos algorítmicos. ICE, Revista De Economía, (921). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2021.921.7265.

Díaz Martínez, Capitolina, Díaz García, Pablo & Navarro Sustaeta, Pablo (2020). Sesgos de género ocultos en los macrodatos y revelados mediante redes neurales: ¿Hombre es a mujer como trabajo es a madre? Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 172, 41-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.172.41.

Franzoni, Valentina (2023). Gender Differences and Bias in Artificial Intelligence. En Jordi Vallverdú (Ed.), Gender in AI and Robotics. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 235 (27-43). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21606-0_2.

Fernández-Vicente, Antonio (2020). Hacia una teoría crítica de la razón algorítmica. Palabra Clave, 23(2), e2322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.2.2.

Gausen, Anna, Guo, Ce & Luk, Wayne (2025). An approach to sociotechnical transparency of social media algorithms using agent-based modelling. AI Ethics 5, 1827-1845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00527-1.

García-Ull, Francisco-José & Melero-Lázaro, Mónica (2023). Gender stereotypes in AI-generated images. Profesional de la Información, 32(5), e320505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.05.

Guzmán Gómez, María Eugenia (2025). Inteligencia artificial y equidad de género. Una perspectiva histórica de los sesgos culturales y su impacto en la relación humana con las tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Sintaxis, 14, 14-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2025n14.02.

O'Connor, Sinead & Liu, Helen (2024). Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: Challenges and opportunities. AI & Society, 39, 2045–2057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01675-4.

ONU Mujeres (2026). La inteligencia artificial está transformando el mundo. La igualdad de género no puede quedarse atrás. ONU Mujeres América Latina y el Caribe, 2 de julio. Recuperado de: https://lac.unwomen.org/es/stories/noticia/2026/07/la-inteligencia-artificial-esta-transformando-el-mundo-la-igualdad-de-genero-no-puede-quedarse-atras.

Perdomo Reyes, Inmaculada (2024). Injusticia epistémica y reproducción de sesgos de género en la inteligencia artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 19(56), 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-555.

Martínez, Lola, Álvaro-Manzano, Jorge, Rego-Robles, Miguel Ángel & Cáceres-Sánchez, Ivan (2026). Gender, ethnic, and social class bias in the use of AIGs for audiovisual media. Ardin. Arte, Diseño e Ingeniería, 15, 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20868/ardin.2026.15.5662.

Montoro-Montarroso, Andrés, Cantón-Correa, Javier, Rosso, Paolo, Chulvi, Berta, Panizo-Lledot, Ángel, Huertas-Tato, Javier, Calvo-Figueras, Blanca, Rementeria, M. José & Gómez-Romero, Juan (2023). Fighting disinformation with artificial intelligence: Fundamentals, advances and challenges. Profesional de la Información, 32(3), e320322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.22.

Leidecker-Sandmann, Melanie, Promies, Nikolai & Lehmkuhl, Markus (2026). Female expertise in public discourses: Visibility of female compared to male scientific experts in German media coverage of eight science-related issues. Public understanding of science, 35(1), 2–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251363937.

Roque Medel, Tania Maratalina (2025). Teoría crítica feminista y perspectiva de género: Fundamentos éticos para la IA. Social Review. International Social Sciences Review Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 13(2), 17-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62701/revsocial.v13.5499.

Sainz de Baranda Andújar, Clara, Gai, Xiaoyu & Franco, Yanna G. (2026). Mujeres que hablan sobre Inteligencia Artificial en la prensa digital española (2017-2021). Las brechas de género en relación con las fuentes. FEMERIS: Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudios de Género, 1, 161-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/femeris.2026.10433.

Shakil, Maheen, Siddiqui, Hassan & Rutherford, M. D. (2025). Picture a scientist: Classification images of scientists are perceived as White, male, and socially inept. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1575123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1575123.

Smrdelj, Ron & Pajnik, Mojca (2024). Enhancing the hybrid media system model: The role of critical theory in media and communication research. European Journal of Communication, 40(1), 55-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241306249.

Túñez-López, Miguel (2021). Tendencias e impacto de la inteligencia artificial en comunicación: Cobotización, gig economy, co-creación y gobernanza. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 22, 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc-v22-25766.

Vrabič Dežman, Dominik (2024). Promising the future, encoding the past: AI hype and public media imagery. AI and Ethics, 4, 743-756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00474-x.

Winkel, Marek (2024). Controlling the uncontrollable: The public discourse on artificial intelligence between the positions of social and technological determinism. AI & Society, 40, 1947-1959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01979-z.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Moreno-Castro, C., & Vernal-Vilicic, T. (2026). PRESENTATION: Algorithms, Bias, and Gender: Artificial Intelligence and the (In)Visibility of Women Scientists in the Media. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 21(62), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.35362/issn.1850-0013-1257

Issue

Section

Dossier