The evaluation of university research

Authors

  • Pablo Miguel Jacovkis Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-533

Keywords:

evaluation, university research, relevancy, interdiscipline

Abstract

This paper discusses the existence of a new social context in which a new way of research and a new university profile may be necessary. Since the way of research has not changed -except from a “social” point of view: how and how fast researchers are in contact among themselves-, the ever-growing need of social inclusion and the ever- growing importance of relevancy and interdiscipline should start to be taken into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Miguel Jacovkis, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

Universidad de Buenos Aires.

References

APPEL, K. y HAKEN, W. (1976): “Every map is four colourable”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 82, pp. 711-712.

GONTHIER, G. (2008): “Formal proof – The four-color theorem”, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 55, nº 11, pp. 1382-1393.

TAYLOR, R. y WILES, A. (1995): “Ring theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras”, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 141, nº 3, pp. 553-572.

WILES, A. (1995): “Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem”, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 141, nº 3, pp. 443-551.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-30

How to Cite

Jacovkis, P. M. (2015). The evaluation of university research. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 10(28), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-533

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 28 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 CC Attribution 4.0

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.

Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.

In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after  the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.