From the philosophy of science to the philosophy of technosciences and innovations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-566

Keywords:

philosophy of science, STS studies, scientific practice, innovation studies

Abstract

This article is based on the assumption that at the end of the 20th century emerged a new form of science, techno-science, which presents technological, economic, political, business, and even military dimensions apart from the strictly scientific one. Techno- science is not limited to describe or explain the world, but rather to transform it. The search for knowledges is subject to the achievement of innovations. Therefore, as well as philosophy of science is needed a philosophy of techno-science and a philosophy of innovation derived from it, because the systems of ID (research and development) are today geared to innovate. For this purpose there is to develop new lines of research: philosophy of scientific practice, philosophy of techno-culture and political philosophy of science, apart from an axiology and a praxeology of science. To argue these proposals three examples of new social and human technos-ciences are commented (cloud computing, systems of indicators and human neurosciences). Furthermore, it is proposed the notion of techno-paradigm, which regulates the contemporary techno- agendas and the way of doing science in the 21st century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Javier Echeverría, Universidad del País Vasco

Departamento de Sociología.

References

BUSH, V. (1945): Science, the Endless Frontier, Washington, Government Printing Office.

CASTELLS, M. (1996-98): La Era de la Información, Madrid, Alianza.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2003): La revolución tecnocientífica, Madrid/México, FCE.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2007): “Towards a Philosophy of Scientific Practice: From Scientific Theories to Scientific Agendas”, en F. Minazzi (ed.): Filosofia, Scienza e Bioetica nel dibattito contemporaneo, Roma, Instituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Staa, pp. 511-524.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2012): “Technomathematical models in Social Sciences”, en M. Weber, D. Dieks, W. J. González, S. Hartman, F. Stadler y M. Stältzner (eds.): Probabilities, Laws, and Structures, Springer, Dordrecht, PSE, pp. 347-360.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2013): Entre cavernas: de Platón al cerebro pasando por Internet, Madrid, Triacastela.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2014): Innovation and Values: a European Perspective, University of Nevada, Center for Basque Studies.

ESTEBAN, J. M. y MARTÍNEZ, S. (2008): Normas y Prácticas en la Ciencia, México DF, UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2004): Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risks Analysis, Brussels, Community Health and Consumer Protection.

GIBBONS, M.; LIMOGES, C.; NOWOTNY, H.; SCHWARTZMAN, S.; SCOTT, P. y TROW, M. (1994): The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Londres, Sage.

JASANOFF, S. (1995): Science at the Bar, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

LATOUR, B. (1987): Science in Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

MARCOS, A. (2010): Ciencia y acción. Una filosofía práctica de la ciencia, Reno, NV, University of Nevada Reno, Center for Basque Studies. la NSF (2002),cientáctica de la ciencia, México DF, FCE.

MARTÍNEZ, S. (2005): Geografía de las prácticas científicas, México, UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas.

OECD (2002): Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, París.

OECD/EUROSTAT (2005): Oslo Manual: Guideliness for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.

OLIVÉ, L. (2007): La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento, México DF, FCE.

RICYT/OEA/CYTED (2001): Standardization of Indicators of Technological Innovation in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: Bogotá Manual, Buenos Aires.

ROCCO, M. y BAINBRIDGE, W. S. (2002): Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, National Science Foundation.

VELASCO, A. y LÓPEZ BELTRÁN, C. (2013): Aproximaciones a la filosofía política de la ciencia, México, UNAM.

ZIMAN, J. (2000): Real Science. What it is and what it means, Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-30

How to Cite

Echeverría, J. (2015). From the philosophy of science to the philosophy of technosciences and innovations. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 10(28), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-566

Issue

Section

Dossier