Elements for the collective construction of techno-scientific models in the context of the relationship between university, business and government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-594Keywords:
techno-science, linear and no linear models, election, systematic efficiencyAbstract
This paper displays a series of data acquired in a systemized manner from a research and application study of a soft technology in an electronic enterprise in the city of Medellin, Colombia. The article aims at contributing to the advances in the theoretical framework, in the process of collective construction of techno-scientific models in the context of the relationship between university, business and government. The methodological approach collects theoretical elements from the linear and non-linear models of innovation, from the concept of systematic efficiency developed by Fisher and from the techniques of the action-research method. This successful experience serves as a reflection regarding the need to implement technical systems that operate in favor of interactive processes, in order to allow the different agents involved to interact harmoniously, define their purposes, means and value scales, identify the nodal points, evaluate risks and assume the costs implicated in the decision.
Downloads
References
AGAZZI, E. (1996): El Bien y el Mal de la Ciencia, Madrid, Tecnos.
BANCO INTERAMERICANO DE DESARRROLLO. (2011): Los Sistemas Regionales de Innovación en América Latina, New York, BID.
BETANCOURT, W. (2004): “El sentido de la ilustración para Kant”, Praxis filosófica, no 18, pp. 7-39.
BOON, M. (2011): “In defense of engineering science: on epistemological relation between science ant technology”. Techné, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 49-71.
BUNGE, M. (1966): “Technology as Applied Science”, Technology and Culture, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 329-347.
CASAS, R. (2004): “Conocimiento, tecnología y desarrollo en América latina”, Revista Mexicana de Sociología, año 66, número especial, pp.255-277.
CORTÉS, F. (2006): “La relación universidad-entorno socioeconómicoy la innovación”. Revista Ingeniería e Investigaciión, vol. 26, no 2, pp. 94-101.
DAGNINO, R.; THOMAS, H y DAVYT, A. (1996): “El pensamiento en ciencia, tecnologia y sociedad en Latino América: una interpretación política de su trayectoria”, Redes, vol. 3, no 7, pp. 13-51.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (1994): “Technology Centers and Industrial Policy: the Emergence of the Interventionist State in the USA”, Science and Public Policy, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 79-88.
ETZKOWITZ, H., y LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from National System and Mode 2 to Triple helix of university-industry-goverment relations”. Research Policy, no 29, pp.109-123.
FERGUSON, N. (2012): Civilización: Occidente y el Resto, México, Debate.
FISHER, J. (2010): El Hombre y La Técnica: hacia una filosofia política de la ciencia y la tecnología, México, UNAM.
GONZALES, M.; LÓPEZ, J. Y LUJÁN, J. (1996): Ciencia, Teconología y Sociedad, Madrid, Tecnos.
GUMMESSON, E. (1991): Qualitative Research in Management, Londres, Sage Publications.
GUTIERREZ, M.; GÓMEZ, M y MARTIN, M. (2001): “¿Es cultura la ciencia?”, Enseñanza de la Ciencia desde la perspectiva de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, Madrid, Narcea.
LÓPEZ, A. (1998): “Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad: el estado de la cuestión en Europa y Estados Unidos”. Revista Iberomaericana de Educación, no 18, pp. 41-68.
LUENGO, E. (2012): Interdisciplina y transdisciplina: aportes desde la investigación y la intervención social universitaria, Guadalajara, ITESO.
LUNDVALL, B. (1988): Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation, Londres, Pinter.
LUNDVALL, B. (1992): National Systems of Innovation, Londres, Pinter.
NELSON, R (1993): National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Study, New York, Oxford Univ. Press.
NG HENAO, R. y LONDOÑO, A. (2012): “Diseño de un modelo de dirección por competencias básicas distintivas para las pymes exportadoras de la ciudad de Medellín”. Semestre Económico, vol. 15, nº 32, pp 197-223.
NUÑEZ, J. (1999): La Ciencia y la Tecnología Como Procesos Sociales, La Habana, Felix Varela.
MAXWELL, N. (1984): From Knowledge to Wisdom: A Revolution in the Aims & Methods of Science, Oxford.
MOUTINHO, L. (2011): Seminario Internacional de Metodología de la Investigación, Medellín, Escuela de Ingenierías de Antioquia.
OLIVÉ, L. (2007): La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento, México, Fondo de Cultura Económico.
PRICE, D.J.S. (1980): “Ciencia y tecnología: Distinciones e interrelaciones”, en Barnes, B. (ed.): Estudios sobre sociología de la ciencia, Madrid, Editorial Alianza Universidad.
QUINTERO, C. (2010): “Enfoque Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad: perspectivas educativas para Colombia”, Revista del Instituto de Estudios en Educación- Universidad del Norte, pp. 222-239.
RATCHFORD, T y BLANPIED, W. (2008): “Paths to the future for science and technology in China, India and the United States”, Technology and Society, vol. 7, no 1, pp. 211-233.
RILEY, R y LOVE, L. (2000): “The state of qualitative tourism research”, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 164-187.
SÁBATO, J. A. y BOTANA, N. (1968): “Science and Technology in the Future Development of Latin América”, The World Order Models Conference, Bellagio, Italia.
SALOMON, J. (1993): Teaching science, technology and society. Developing science and technology series, Philadelphia, Open University.
SANTOS, M. (2002): “Relaciones entre cencia, tecnología y sociedad”, Enseñanza de la Ciencias desde la perspectiva de CTS, Madrid, Narcea.
SKOLIMOWSKI, H. (1966): “The structure of thinking in technology”, Technology and Culture, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 371-383.
TARAZANA, L. (2003): “Tecnociencia, sociedad y valores”. Ingeniería y Desarrollo, vol. 14, 38-59.
VASEN, F. (2011): “Los sentidos de la relevancia en la política científica”. Revista Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad, vol. 7, n o19, pp.11-46.
WINNER, L. (2008): La Ballena y el Reactor, Madrid, Gedisa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CC Attribution 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.
