Science Education, Communication and Appropriation from a Pluralistic Perspective: Experiences in the Construction of Dialogue for the Social Ownership of Knowledge
Keywords:
social use of knowledge, scientific and technological culture, dialogue about knowledge, local and traditional knowledge, social innovation networksAbstract
Scientific culture and the social appropriation of knowledge are considered basic conditions in order to face some of the challenges of the knowledge society. Therefore, the need to promote actions to foster citizens capable of participating in the different stages of scientific and technological processes is often pointed out. However, many of these proposals do not consider cultural diversity, the recognition of traditional knowledge, the need for dialogue about knowledge or the participation of different parties in the decision-making process. In the last stage of his philosophy, León Olivé’s pluralistic approaches created a framework of concepts that accepts this need for dialogue about knowledges and the construction of knowledge-based societies, bearing cultural diversity in mind. In addition, these concepts are projected to models of social appropriation of knowledge in which the key is the adaptation of the knowledge to the natural and cultural context of diverse communities. In this paper, practical experiences of social appropriation of knowledge are presented, each one directly related to the means proposed by Olivé to achieve a strong social appropriation of scientific and technological knowledge, which are: scientific education, the communication of science and the creation of an active participation in social innovation networks.Downloads
References
ARGUETA, A, GÓMEZ-SALAZAR, M. y NAVIA, J. (2012): Conocimiento tradicional, innovación y reapropiación social, UNAM-Siglo XXI Editores.
BONFIL, G. (1991): “La teoría del control cultural en el estudio de procesos étnicos”, Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, vol. 4, n° 12, pp. 165-204. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/316/31641209.pdf
HARDING, S. (1991): “Gender, Development and Post-enlightment Philosophies of Science”, U. Narayan y S. Harding (eds): Descentering the Center. Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial and Feminist World, Indiana University.
OLIVÉ, L. (1999): Multiculturalismo y Pluralismo, México DF, Paidós.
OLIVÉ, L. (2000): El bien, el mal y la razón. Facetas de la ciencia y la tecnología, México DF, Paidós.
OLIVÉ, L. (2008): Los desafíos de la sociedad del conocimiento: exclusión, diversidad cultural y justicia social, México DF, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
OLIVÉ, L. (2009): “Por una auténtica interculturalidad basada en el reconocimiento de la pluralidad epistemológica” en L. Tapia Mealla (coord.): Pluralismo Epistemológico, La Paz, CLACSO, CIDES-Universidad Mayor de San Andrés.
POLINO, C. (2015): “Las encuestas de percepción pública de la ciencia en América Latina: estructura, evolución y comparabilidad”, en L. Massarani (ed.): Red Pop: 25 años de popularización de la ciencia en América Latina, Río de Janeiro, RedPop-Unesco-Museo da Vida.
RAMÍREZ CASTAÑEDA, E. (2006): La Educación Indígena en México, UNAM.
SANTOS, B. de S. (2009): Una epistemología del sur: la reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social.
VELASCO, A. (2011): “Equidad epistémica, racionalidad y diversidad cultural”, en C. López y A. Velasco (coords.): Aproximaciones a la filosofía política de la ciencia, México DF, UNAM.
VILLORO, L. (1998): Estado plural, pluralidad de las culturas, Editorial Paidós.
VILLORO, L. (1982): Creer, saber, conocer, Siglo XXI Editores.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.