From Expert Demonstration to Participatory Dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-947Keywords:
science, policies, regulation, environmental issuesAbstract
This paper analyzes the role of science in the development and implementation of policies. The article presents and discusses different conceptual models (mainly the modern model) which describe the relation and interfaces between science and regulation policies of environmental subjects. As well, considering that these models present underlying assumptions, strong points and limitations, and that none of them offer a universal solution, the author proposes new alternatives on the basis of the reformulation of these models.
Downloads
References
BECK, U. (1992): Risk Society: Towards a new modernity, Sage, London.
BUSH, V. (1945): Science -The Endless Frontier, A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, July 1945 (United States Government Printing Office, Washington: 1945), http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm
CBD (1992): “Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety”. Disponible en: http//www.biodiv.org/biosafe/protocol
DE MARCHI, B. (2003): “Public participation and risk governance”, Science and Public Policy, Nº30, 3, June 171-176.
EU (2002): “Communication from the Communities on the collection and use of expertise by the commission: principle and guidelines” (COM 2002:713), Brussels.
EU (2001): “Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle” (COM 2000:1), Brussels.
EU (2001): “Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing”, Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Brussels.
FISHER, R.A. (1951): The Design of Experiments, 6th edition, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
FUNTOWICZ, S.O. (2006): “Why Knowledge Assessment?”, S. Vaz , A. Pereira (eds): Interfaces between Science and Society, EC Joint Research Centre, (en prensa).
FUNTOWICZ, S.O., RAVETZ, J.R. (1993): “Science for the post normal age”, Futures 25:739-755.
FUNTOWICZ, S.O., RAVETZ, J.R. (1990): “Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy”, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 7-16.
GIGERENZER, G. (2004): “Mindless Statistics”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 587-606.
LASH, S., SZERSZYNSKI, WYNNE, B [ed.] (1996): Risk, Environment & Modernity -Towards a New Ecology, TCS Sage, London.
LATOUR, Bruno (1993): We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., USA.
LOSEY, J.E., RAYOR, L.S., CARTER, M.E. (1999): “Transgenic pollen harm monarch larvae”, Nature, 399:214
LYOTARD, J.F. (1984): “The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge”, Bennington G & Massumi B. Foreword by Jameson F. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press & Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
MARRIS, C., WYNNE, B., SIMMONS, P., WELDON, S. (2001): “Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe”, Final report of the PABE research project, Lancaster, UK: University of Lancaster.
NOWOTNY, H, SCOTT, P., GIBBONS, M. (2001): Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity Press.
QUIST, D., CHAPELA, I.H. (2001): “Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico”, Nature, 414:541-543.
REES, M. (2003): Our Final Hour, Basic Books.
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON PLANTS (1999): “Opinion of the Scientific Committee on the Invocation of Austria of Article 16 (‘safeguard’ clause) of Council Directive 90/220/EC with respect to theplacing on the market of the Monsanto genetically modified maize (MON810) expressing the Bt cryia(b) gene, notification”, C/F/95/12/02.
STRAND, R. (2002): “Complexity, Ideology and Governance”, Emergence, 4:164-183.
STRAND, R. (2001): “The role of risk assessment in the governance of genetically modified organisms in agriculture”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86:187-204.
WEINBERG, A. (1972): “Science and tran-science”, Minerva, 10:209-222
WYNNE, B. (1992): “Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconcieving science and policy in the preventive paradigm”, Global Environmental Change, 2:111-127.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CC Attribution 4.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.