Avaliações internacionais em larga escala e o regulamento global de sistemas educacionais: uma análise integrativa
Palavras-chave:
avaliações internacionais em larga escala, regulamentação global, big science, governamentalidadeResumo
Desde a década de 1990, as avaliações internacionais em larga escala do desempenho educacional se expandiram em todo o mundo. Embora com origens diferentes, eles têm moldado um dispositivo técnico que conecta e se sobrepõe aos governos nacionais e influencia, de diferentes maneiras, a regulamentação global e nacional da educação. O artigo concentra-se em responder a duas perguntas: 1) qual é a fonte de sua força expansiva e regulatória; e 2) que esses mecanismos avaliativos produzem. As respostas fornecidas convergem ao mostrar que esses sistemas internacionais de avaliação constituem um dispositivo de governamentalidade global que está redesenhando a operação dos sistemas educacionais em todo o mundo, estabelecendo novos padrões normativos e redefinindo as noções de qualidade, abrindo os sistemas educacionais a revisão e discussão em um quadro global de referência. Esse dispositivo é sustentado por uma estrutura operacional baseada em redes internacionais, por trabalhos de investigação científica em grande escala e orientada por uma crescente preocupação prática pelo desenho de políticas educacionais. Nas últimas duas décadas, esse dispositivo adquiriu um grande potencial adaptativo que está continuamente expandindo sua força regulatória e performativa.Downloads
Referências
Baird, J., Isaacs, T., Johnson, S., Stobart, G., Yu, G., Sprague, T. y Daugherty, R. (2011). Policy Effects of PISA. Report Commissioned by Pearson UK. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
Baker, D. y Letendre, G. (2005). National Differences, Global Similarities. World Culture and the Future of Schooling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ball, S. y Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bhanji, Z. (2016). The Business Case for Transnational Corporate Participation, Profits, and Policy Making in Education. En K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard y A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (419-432). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Benveniste, L. (2002). The Political Structuration of Assessment: Negotiating State Power and Legitimacy. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 89-118.
Breakspear, S. (2012). The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmaking in School System Performance. OECD Education Working Papers, 71. París: OECD Publishing.
Burgi, R. y Trohler, D. (2018). Producing the “Right Kind of People”. En S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson y T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society. The Expertise of International Assessment (75-91). Nueva York: Routledge.
Busch, L. (2011). Standards. Recipes for Reality. Cambridge. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Callon, M. (1998). The Law of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Carvalho, L. (2018). International Assessments and Its Expertise Fabricating Expert Knowledge for Policy. En S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson y T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society. The Expertise of International Assessment (110-126). Nueva York: Routledge.
Carnoy, M. (2015). International Test Score Comparison and Education Policy: A Review of the Critiques. Boulder: National Educational Policy Centre.
Eklof, H. y Hopfenbeck, T. (2019). Self-Reported Effort and Motivation in the PISA Test. En B. Maddox (Ed.), International Large-Scale Assessments in Education (121-136). Londres: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fischman, G., Topper, A., Silova, I., Goebel, J. y Holloway, J. (2018). Examining the Influence of International Large-scale Assessments on National Education Policies. Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 470-499.
Foucault, M. (2000a). Essential Works, 1954-1984. Volume 3: Power. Nueva York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (2000b). Defender la Sociedad. Curso en el College de France (1975-1976). México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Fulge, T., Bieber, T. y Martens, K. (2016). Rational Intentions and Unintended Consequences: On the Interplay Between International and National Actors in Education Policy. En K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard y A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (453-469). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gorur, R. (2011). ANT on the PISA Trail: Following the Statistical Pursuit of Certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 76-93.
Gorur, R. (2016a). Seeing like PISA: A Cautionary Tale about the Performativity of International Assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598-616.
Gorur, R. (2016b). The “Thin Descriptions” of the Secondary Analyses of PISA. Educação & Sociedade, 37(136), 647-668.
Gorur, R. (2018). Standards: Normative, Interpretative, and Performative. En S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson y T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society. The Expertise of International Assessment (92-109). Nueva York: Routledge.
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by Numbers: the PISA “Effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23-37.
Grek, S. (2018). OECD as a Site of Coproduction: The European Education Governance and the New Politics of “Policy Mobilization”. En S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson y T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society. The Expertise of International Assessment (185-200). Nueva York: Routledge.
Hoptmann, S., Brinek, G. y Retzl, M. (2007). PISA According to PISA. Berlín: LIT Verlag.
Husen, T. (1975). Multi-national evaluation of school systems. IIЕР Occasional Papers, 37. París: Unesco, International Institute for Educational Planning.
IEA (2018). 60 Years of IEA (1958-2018). Amsterdam: IEA.
Keeves, J. (2011). IEA – From the Beginning in 1958 to 1990. En C. Papanastasiou, T. Plomp y E. Papanastasiou (Eds.), IEA 1958-2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (3-40). Amsterdam: IEA.
Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2010). On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham: Duke University Press.
Latour, B. (2001). La esperanza de Pandora. Ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial.
Lawn, M. (2008). An Atlantic Crossing. The Work of the International Examination Inquiry, its Researchers, Methods and Influence. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Lingard, B. y Sellar, S. (2016). The Changing Organizational and Global Significance of the OECD’s Education Work. En K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard y A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (357-373). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lietz, P., Cresswell, J., Rust, K. y Adams, R. (2017). Implementation of Large-Scale Education Assessments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Lockheed, M. (2011). Reflections on IEA from the Perspective of a World Bank Official. En C. Papanastasiou, T. Plomp y E. Papanastasiou (Eds.), IEA 1958-2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (711-720). Amsterdam: IEA.
Lockheed, M. (2013). Causes and Consequences of International Assessments in Developing Countries. En H. Meyer y A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power and Policy. The Emergence of Global Educational Governance (163-184). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Lundahl, C. (2018). The “Beauty” of PISA: The Politics of How PISA Scores Are Used to Represent Public Education. Ponencia presentada en AERA 2018 Annual Meeting. Abril 13-17, Nueva York.
Mackenzie, D. (2006). An Engine not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mendelovits, J. (2017). Test Development. En P. Lietz, J. Cresswell, K. Rust y R. Adams (Eds.), Implementation of Large-Scale Education Assessments (63-91). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Meyer, H. y Benavot, A. (2013). PISA, Power and Policy. The Emergence of Global Educational Governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Mundy, K. y Verger, A. (2015). The World Bank and the Global Governance of Education in a Changing World Order. International Journal of Education Development, 40, 9-18.
Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy. Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Londres: Routledge.
Novoa, A. y Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative Research in Education: A Mode of Governance or a Historical Journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423-438.
OCDE (2014). PISA 2012. Technical Report. París: OECD Publishing.
OCDE (2019). PISA 2018 Results. What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. Volume III. París: OECD Publishing.
Osborne, T. y Rose, N. (1999). Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena? The Example of Public Opinion Research. British Journal of Sociology, 50(3), 367-396.
Ozga, J. y Lingard, B. (2006). Globalization, Education Policy and Politics. En B. Lingard y J. Ozga (eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Education Policy and Politics. Londres: Routledge Falmer.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ramos Zincke, C. (2012). El ensamblaje de ciencia social y sociedad. Conocimiento científico, gobierno de las conductas y producción de lo social. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
Ramos Zincke, C. (2014). Datos y relatos de la ciencia social como componentes de la producción de realidad social. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 21(66), 151-177.
Ramírez, F., Schofer, E. y Meyer, J. (2018). International Tests, National Assessments, and Educational Development (1970-2012). Comparative Education Review, 62(3), 344-364.
Ramírez, F., Meyer, J. y Lerch, J. (2016). World Society and the Globalization of Educational Policy. En K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard y A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (43-63). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rivas, A. y Scasso, M. (2017). ¿Qué países mejoraron la calidad educativa? América Latina en las evaluaciones de aprendizaje. Documento de Trabajo, 16. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC.
Rizvi, F. y Lingard, B. (2010): Globalizing Education Policy. Londres: Routledge.
Rutkowski, L., Von Davier, M. y Rutkowski, D. (2014). Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment. Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Sellar, S. y Lingard, B. (2013). PISA and the Expanding Role of the OECD in Global Educational Governance. En H. Meyer y A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power and Policy. The Emergence of Global Educational Governance (185-206). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Sahlberg, P. (2016). The Global Educational Reform Movement and Its Impact on Schooling En K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard y A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (128-144). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schneider, S. (2013). The International Standard Classification of Education 2011. Comparative Social Research, 30, 365-379.
Sjoberg, S. (2019). The PISA Syndrome. How the OECD has Hijacked the Way we Perceive pupils, Schools and Education. Confero, 7(1), 12-65.
UNESCO-OREALC (1998). Primer Estudio Internacional Comparativo sobre lenguaje, matemática y factores asociados en tercero y cuarto grado. Santiago: Unesco.
UNESCO-OREALC (2008). SERCE. Los aprendizajes de los estudiantes de América Latina y el Caribe. Primer reporte. Santiago: Unesco.
UNESCO-OREALC (2014). Comparación de resultados del segundo y tercer estudio regional comparativo y explicativo. SERCE y TERCE 2006-2013. Santiago: Unesco.
UNESCO-OREALC (2015). TERCE. Informe nacional de resultados. Santiago: Agencia de Calidad de la Educación y Unesco.
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C. y Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming Governance through Policy Instruments: How and to What Extent Standards, Tests and Accountability in Education Spread Worldwide. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248-270.
Volante, L. (2016). The Intersection of International Achievement Testing and Educational Policy. Global Perspectives on Large-Scale Reform. Londres: Routledge.
Wagemaker, H. (2014). International Large-Scale Assessments: From Research to Policy. En L. Rutkowski, M. von Davier y D. Rutkowski (Eds.), Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment. Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis (11-36). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Ydesen, C. y Andreasen, K. (2019). Los antecedentes históricos de la cultura evaluativa global en el ámbito de la educación. Foro de Educación, 17(26), 1-24.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Todas os números de CTS e seus artigos individuais estão sob uma licença CC-BY.
Desde 2007, a CTS proporciona acesso livre, aberto e gratuito a todos seus conteúdos, incluídos o arquivo completo da edição quadrimestral e os diversos produtos apresentados na plataforma eletrônica. Esta decisão é baseada no entendimento de que fornecer acesso livre aos materiais publicados ajuda a ter uma maior e melhor troca de conhecimentos.
Por sua vez, em se tratando da edição quadrimestral, a revista permite aos repositórios institucionais e temáticos, bem como aos sites pessoais, o autoarquivo dos artigos na versão post-print ou versão editorial, logo após da publicação da versão definitiva de cada número e sob a condição de incorporar ao autoarquivo um link direcionado à fonte original.
