Origen, actualidad y prospectiva de la filosofía de la biología
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-568Palavras-chave:
filosofía de la biología, filosofía de las ciencias, darwinismo, evolucionismoResumo
En este artículo se analiza, en primer lugar, cómo surgió la filosofía de la biología a partir de los debates en el campo de la filosofía general de la ciencia y los desarrollos en la biología. En segundo lugar, se plantean las diferencias entre la filosofía de la biología y la filosofía tradicional de la ciencia que fue, casi exclusivamente, una filosofía de la física. Finalmente se plantean los principales debates actuales dentro de la filosofía de la biología, sobre todo los que se refieren a las investigaciones sobre los conceptual puzzles que la biología plantea y el estudio de problemas filosóficos que surgen de la biología, pero que no son problemas científicos estrictamente.
Downloads
Referências
AMUNDSON, R. (2005): The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought, Cambridge University Press.
ARTHUR, W. (2004): Biased Embryos and Evolution, Cambridge University Press.
AYALA, F. J. (1976): “Biology as an autonomous science”, en M. Grene y E. Mendelsohn (eds.): Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science XXVII: Topics in Philosophy of Biology, pp. 313–329.
AYER, A. (1959): Logical Positivism, Glencoe, Free Press.
AZKONOBIETA, T. (2005): Evolución, desarrollo y (auto)organización.
BARNES, B. (1985): About Science, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
BAUER, H. H. (1992): Scientific Literacy and the Myth of Scientific Method, Urbana, U. Illinois Press.
BEATTY, J. (1995): “The evolutionary contingency thesis”, en G. Wolters y J. Lennox (eds.): Theories and rationality in the biological sciences. The Second Annual Pittsburgh/Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, Pittsburg, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 45-81.
BEHE, M. (1996): Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press.
BLOOR, D. (1971): Knowledge and Social Imaginary.
BRANDON, R. N. (1978): “Adaptation and evolutionary theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 9, pp. 181-206.
BRANDON, R. N. (1980): “A structural description of evolutionary biology”, en P. D. Asquith y T. Nickles (eds.): PSA 1980, East Lansing/Michigan, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 427-439.
BRANDON, R. N. (1997): “Does biology have laws? The experimental evidence”. Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. 444-457.
BURTT, E. H. (1924): The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. A Historical and Critical Essay, Londres, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
CAPONI, G. (2013): "Niveles de sobreviniencia y expectativas reduccionistas en biología", en A. Diéguez y V. Claramonte (eds.): Contrastes, Revista Internacional de Filosofía - Filosofía actual de la biología, pp. 27-40.
CARRIER, M. (1995): “Evolutionary change and lawlikeness. Beatty on biological generalizations”, en G. Wolters y J. Lennox (eds.): Theories and rationality in the biological sciences. The Second Annual Pittsburgh/Konstanz Coloquim in the Philosophy of Science. Pittsburg, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 83-97.
CASANUEVA, M., FOLGUERA, G. y PEIMBERT, M. (2013): “Jerarquías integración y complejidad en biología, un posible marco para la evo-devo”, en A. Diéguez y V. Claramonte (eds.): Contrastes, Revista Internacional de Filosofía - Filosofía actual de la biología, pp. 127-142.
COLLINS, H. M. (1974): “The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks”, Science Studies, vol. 4, pp. 165-185.
COLLINS, H. M. (1983): “The sociology of scientific knowledge: studies of contemporary science”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 9, pp. 265-285.
CRONIN, H. (1992): The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from DarwIn to Today, Cambridge University Press.
DAWKINS, R. (1976): The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press.
DAWKINS, R. (1982): The extended phenotype, Oxford University Press
DE COOREBYTER, V. (1994): Rhetoriques de la Science, París, PUF.
DENNETT, D. (1995): Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, Londres, Penguin.
DOBZHANSKY, T. (1937): Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press.
DOBZHANSKY, T. (1973): “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution”, The American Biology Teacher, vol. 35, pp. 125-129.
FEYERABEND, P. (1970): “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8.
FISHER, R. (1930): The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon, Nueva York.
FLECK, L. (1935): Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, Basilea, Benno Schwabe.
FOX KELLER, E. (1995): Refiguring Life Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology, Columbia University Press.
GODFREY-SMITH, P. (2001): “Three kinds of adaptationism”, en S. H. Orzak y E. Sober (eds): Adaptationism and Optimality, pp. 335-338.
GOULD, S, J. (1983): Hens’ Teeth and Horses’ Toes, Nueva York, W. W. Norton Company.
GOULD, S. (1989): Wonderful Life. The Burgués Shale and the Nature of History, Nueva York, W.W. Norton & Company.
GOULD, S. J. (2002): The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Harvard College Press.
GOULD, S. J. y LEWONTIN, R. C. (1979): “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. 205, pp. 581—598.
GRIFFITHS, P., (2011): “Philosophy of Biology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponible en: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/biology- philosophy.
HABERMAS, J. (2001): Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weh su einer liberalen Eugenik?, Francfort del Meno, Suhrkamp Verlag.
HALDANE, J. B. S. (1932): The Causes of Evolution, Longman, Green and Co., Princeton University Press.
HALL, B. (1992): Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Londres, Chapman & Hall.
HANSON, N. R. (1958): Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press.
HARVEY, B. (1981): “The effects of social context of the process of scientific investigation: Experimental test of quantum mechanics”.
HULL, D. (1974): Philosophy of Biological Science, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
HULL, D., (1998): “Progreso panglosiano”.
HUXLEY, J. S. (S/F): The New Systematics, Oxford University Press.
JACOB, F. (1970): La logique du vivant. Une histoire de l’heredité, París, Gallimard.
KAUFFMAN, S. (1993): Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press.
KUHN, T. S. (1962): The structure of scientific revolutions, The University of Chicago Press.
LAKATOS, I. (1970): “Falsification and the Metodology of the Scientific Research Programmes”.
LAKATOS, I. (1971): “History of Sciences and its Racional Reconstructions”.
LAKATOS, I. y MUSGRAVE, A. (1970): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.
LATOUR, B. (1987): Science in Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
LATOUR, B. y WOOLGAR, S. (1979): Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Hollywood, Sage.
LEWONTIN, R. C. (1979): “Sociobiology as an adaptationist program”, Behavioural Science, vol. 24, pp. 5-14.
LOCKE, D. (1992): Science as Writing, Yale University.
LORENZANO, P. (2007): “Leyes fundamentales y leyes de la biología”, Scientiæ
Zudia, São Paulo, vol. 5, nº 2, pp. 185-214.
MAYNARD SMITH, J. (1971): “The origin and maintenance of sex”, en G. C. Williams (ed.): Group Selection, pp 163-171.
MAYNARD SMITH, J. (1982): “Eugenesia y utopía”, en F. Manuel: Utopías y pensamiento utópico, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.
MAYNARD SMITH, J. y BURIAN, R. (1985): “Developmental Constraints and Evolution”, Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 60, nº 3, pp. 265–287.
MAYR, E. (1942): Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press.
MAYR, E. (1969): “Footnotes on the Philosophy of Biology”, Pilosophy of Science, vol. 36, nº 2, pp. 197–202.
MAYR, E. (1997): “The objects of selection”, Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, pp. 2091-2094.
MAYR, E. (2006): ¿Por qué es única la biología? Consideraciones sobre la autonomía de una disciplina cientifica, Buenos Aires, Katz.
MERTON, R. (1973): The Sociology of Science, Nueva York, Free Press.
MILLS, S. y BEATTY, J. (1979): “The propensity interpretation of fitness”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 46, pp. 263–286.
MONOD, J. (1970): Le Hasard et la nécessité, París, Ediciones du Seuil.
NUSSBAUM, M. (2002): “Genética y Justicia: tratar la enfermedad, respetar la diferencia”, Isegoría, n° 27, pp. 5-17.
PALMA, H. (2005): “Gobernar es seleccionar”, Historia y reflexiones sobre el mejoramiento genético en seres humanos, Buenos Aires, Baudino Ediciones.
PALMA, H. y WOLOVELSKY, E. (2013): “About the risks of a new eugenics”, en P. Lorenzano, L. Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins y A. C. K. P. Regner (eds.): History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences in the South Cone, Londres, College Publishing Ltd.
PICKERING, A. (1981): “The role of interests in high energy phisycs: the choice between charm and colour”.
PICKERING, A. (1984): Constructing quarks, The University of Edinburgh Press.
PINCH, T. (1981): “Theoreticians and the production of experimental anomaly”.
POPPER, K. (1958): The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Londres, Hutchinson.
POPPER, K. (1970): Objective Knowledge, Oxford, Clarendon.
POPPER, K. (1974): “Unended Quest: An Intelectual Autobiography”, en Schilpp (ed.): The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, Open Court Press.
QUINE W. (1953): From a Logical Point of View, Nueva York, Harper and Rowe.
QUINE, W. (1960): World and Object, Cambridge, MIT Press.
QUINE, W. (1969): Ontological Relativity and the Other Essays, Columbia University Press.
RAFF, R. (1996): The Shape of Life: Genes, Development and the Evolution of Animal, en C. Romeo Casabona (ed.): La eugenesia hoy, Bilbao-Granada.
ROSENBERG, A. (1978): “The supervenience of biological concepts”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 368–386.
ROSENBERG, A. (1985): The structure of biological science, Cambridge University Press.
ROSENBERG, A. y MCSHEA, D. (2008): Philosophy of Biology. A contemporary introduction, Nueva York, Routledge.
RUSE, M. (1970): “Are there laws in biology?”, Australasian Journal of Philosphy, vol. 48, pp. 234-246.
RUSE, M. (1998): “Evolución y progreso: crónica de dos conceptos”.
RUSE, M. (1979): La filosofía de la biología, Madrid, Alianza.
SCHAFFNER, K. F. (1967a): “Antireductionism and Molecular Biology”, en R. Munson (ed.): Man and Nature: Philosophical Issues in Biology, New York, Dell, pp. 44–54.
SCHAFFNER, K. F. (1967b): “Approaches to Reduction”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 34, pp. 137–147.
SCHAFFNER, K. F. (1969): “The Watson-Crick model and reductionism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, pp. 325–348.
SIMPSON, G. G. (1944): Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press.
SMART, J. J. C. (1963): Philosophy and scientific realism, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
SOBER, E. (1984): The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge, MIT Press.
SOBER, E. (1994): Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology, Cambridge, MIT Press.
SOBER, E., (1993): Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press.
SOBER, E. (1996): Filosofía de la biología, Madrid, Alianza.
SOBER, E (1998): “Six Sayings about Adaptationism”, The Philosophy of Biology.
THORNHILL, R. y USSERY, D. (2000): “A Classification of Possible Routes of Darwinian Evolution”, The journal of theoretical biology, vol. 203, pp. 111-116.
TOULMIN, S. (1961): Foresight and understanding, Nueva York, Harper Torchbooks.
WAGENSBERG, J. y AGUSTÍ, J. (1998): El progreso, Barcelona, Tusquets.
WILLIAMS, G. C. (1966): Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press.
WILSON, E. O. (1975): Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
WOOLGAR, S. (1988): Science: the Very Idea, Londres, Tavistock.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 CC Attribution 4.0
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todas os números de CTS e seus artigos individuais estão sob uma licença CC-BY.
Desde 2007, a CTS proporciona acesso livre, aberto e gratuito a todos seus conteúdos, incluídos o arquivo completo da edição quadrimestral e os diversos produtos apresentados na plataforma eletrônica. Esta decisão é baseada no entendimento de que fornecer acesso livre aos materiais publicados ajuda a ter uma maior e melhor troca de conhecimentos.
Por sua vez, em se tratando da edição quadrimestral, a revista permite aos repositórios institucionais e temáticos, bem como aos sites pessoais, o autoarquivo dos artigos na versão post-print ou versão editorial, logo após da publicação da versão definitiva de cada número e sob a condição de incorporar ao autoarquivo um link direcionado à fonte original.
