PRESENTACIÓN: Formas y fondos de la innovación responsable

Concepciones y experiencias plurirregionales

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-1120

Resumen

Las realidades que habitamos son en gran medida el resultado de la acción de la ciencia y la tecnología. Su capacidad transformadora, o creadora, de mundos, ha estado habitualmente al servicio del aprovechamiento, o instrumentalización, masiva y sistemática de recursos materiales y simbólicos, con vistas a la consecución de determinados fines, considerados -para cada momento y circunstancia- como deseables por parte de ciertos actores.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Hannot Rodríguez, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)

Profesor agregado del Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU (Facultad de Letras), España. Investigador principal del grupo PRAXIS (UPV/EHU).

Sergio Urueña, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)

Investigador posdoctoral (personal investigador doctor del Programa Posdoctoral del Gobierno Vasco). Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU (Facultad de Educación, Filosofía y Antropología), España. Miembro del grupo PRAXIS (UPV/EHU).

Citas

Arnaldi, S., Quaglio, G., Ladikas, M., O’Kane, H., Karapiperis, T., Srinivas, K. R. & Zhao, Y. (2015). Responsible governance in science and technology policy: Reflections from Europe, China and India. Technology in Society, 42, 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.03.006.

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Comisión Europea (2013). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013. Bruselas.

Comisión Europea (2019). Horizon Europe Programme: Strategic Plan 2021–2024. Bruselas. Recuperado de: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/horizon_europe_strategic_plan_2021-2024.pdf.

Comisión Europea (2024). Horizon Europe, Work Programme 2023–2025: 11. Widening participation and strengthening the European Research Area, C(2024) 2371 of 17 April 2024. Recuperado de: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2023-2024/wp-11-widening-participation-and-strengthening-the-european-research-area_horizon-2023-2024_en.pdf.

Comisión Europea (2025). G20 Ministers commit to Global Science Cooperation – EU’s leading role instrumental in advancing sustainable, inclusive, and innovative science, technology and innovation (News Article, 14 October 2025, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation). Recuperado de: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/g20-ministers-commit-global-science-cooperation-eus-leading-role-instrumental-advancing-sustainable-2025-10-14_en.

Comisión Europea (s/f). Open Science – The EU’s open science policy. Recuperado de: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/our-digital-future/open-science_en.

David, K. & Thompson, P. B. (Eds.) (2008). What Can Nanotechnology Learn from Biotechnology? Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience from the Debate over Agrifood Biotechnology and GMOs. Ámsterdam: Academic Press.

Doezema, T., Ludwig, D., Macnaghten, P., Shelley-Egan, C. & Forsberg, E. M. (2019). Translation, transduction, and transformation: expanding practices of responsibility across borders. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 323-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.

Einsiedel, E. F. & Goldenberg, L. (2004). Dwarfing the Social? Nanotechnology Lessons from the Biotechnology Front. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(1), 28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604263110.

Elizalde, J. (1998). General Introduction: ELSA in F.P. 4, European Commission, E(thical), L(egal) and S(ocial) A(spects) of the Life Sciences and Technologies Programmes of Framework Programme IV. Catalogue of Contracts. EUR 18309. Bruselas.

Felitti, K. (2012). La revolución de la píldora: Sexualidad y política en los sesenta. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.

Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P. B. et al. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission (EUR 22700). Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Recuperado de: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442.

Gao, L., Liao, M. & Zhao, Y. (2019). Exploring complexity, variety and the necessity of RRI in a developing country: the case of China. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 368-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603572.

Gatew, H. & Mengistu, K. (2019). Genetically modified foods (GMOs); a review of genetic engineering. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 9(6), 157-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36380/scil.2019.jlsb25.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Greely, H. T. (1998). Legal, Ethical, and Social Iissues in Human Genome Research.Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 473-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.473.

Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.

Kinchy, A. (2012). Seeds, Science, and Struggle: The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9099.001.0001.

Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B., Macnaghten, P. & Leeuwis, C. (2022). Making knowledge work differently: The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation. En D. Ludwig, B. Boogaard, P. Macnaghten & C. Leeuwis (Eds.), The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation (1-16). Abingdon & Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003112525-1.

McAfee, K. (2008). Beyond techno-science: Transgenic maize in the fight over Mexico’s future. Geoforum, 39(1), 148-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.002.

Molak, V. (Ed.) (1997). Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.

Owen, R., Bessant, J. R. & Heintz, M. (Eds.) (2013), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.

Pandey, P. (2024). Responsible innovation goes south: critique, othering, and a commitment to care. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2295594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2295594.

Pansera, M. & Owen, R. (2020). Multiplicidad interpretativa en las prácticas de investigación e innovación responsables en 12 países: análisis y resultados. Caleidoscopio - Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 24(43), 23-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33064/43crscsh1980.

Piaz, A. (2024). Movimientos antinucleares en América Latina: el “no a la central” en la Patagonia Argentina. Polis (Santiago), 23(68), 245-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-6568/2024-n68-3302.

Rip, A. (1986). The Mutual Dependence of Risk Research and Political Context. Science & Technology Studies, 4(3/4), 3-15. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/690407.

Schot, J. & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.

Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Srinivas, K. R. (2022). Responsible Research and Innovation and India: A Case for Contextualization and Mutual Learning. En D. O’Mathúna & R. Iphofen (Eds.), Ethics, Integrity and Policymaking: The Value of the Case Study (29-48). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15746-2_3.

Stirling, A. (2024). Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality: opening up ‘innovation democracies’ for sustainability transformations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2370082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2370082.

van Oudheusden, M. & Shelley-Egan, C. (2021). RRI Futures: learning from a diversity of voices and visions. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8(2), 139-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1989656.

Vasen, F. (2017). Responsible Innovation in Developing Countries: An Enlarged Agenda. En L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 3: An European Agenda? (93-109). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_6.

von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. En R. Owen, J. R. Bessant y M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (51-74). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.

von Schomberg, R. (2024). Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science? Merton Revisited and the Prospects of Institutionalizing the Research Values of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness. NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation, 6, 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95874.

von Schomberg, R. & Hankins, J. (Eds.) (2019). International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.

Watkins, E. S. (2012). How the Pill Became a Lifestyle Drug: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Birth Control in the United States Since 1960. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1462-1472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300706.

Zwart, H. & Nelis, A. (2009). What is ELSA genomics? EMBO reports, 10(6), 540-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.115.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-11-20

Cómo citar

Rodríguez, H. ., & Urueña, S. (2025). PRESENTACIÓN: Formas y fondos de la innovación responsable: Concepciones y experiencias plurirregionales. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS, 20(60), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-1120

Número

Sección

Dossier