PRESENTATION: Forms and Contents of Responsible Innovation
Pluriregional Conceptions and Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-1120Abstract
The realities we inhabit are largely the result of science and technology. Their transformative and world-creating capacity has usually been at the service of the massive and systematic exploitation of material and symbolic resources, with a view to achieving certain ends, considered -for each moment and circumstance- as desirable by certain actors.
Downloads
References
Arnaldi, S., Quaglio, G., Ladikas, M., O’Kane, H., Karapiperis, T., Srinivas, K. R. & Zhao, Y. (2015). Responsible governance in science and technology policy: Reflections from Europe, China and India. Technology in Society, 42, 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.03.006.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Comisión Europea (2013). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013. Bruselas.
Comisión Europea (2019). Horizon Europe Programme: Strategic Plan 2021–2024. Bruselas. Recuperado de: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/horizon_europe_strategic_plan_2021-2024.pdf.
Comisión Europea (2024). Horizon Europe, Work Programme 2023–2025: 11. Widening participation and strengthening the European Research Area, C(2024) 2371 of 17 April 2024. Recuperado de: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2023-2024/wp-11-widening-participation-and-strengthening-the-european-research-area_horizon-2023-2024_en.pdf.
Comisión Europea (2025). G20 Ministers commit to Global Science Cooperation – EU’s leading role instrumental in advancing sustainable, inclusive, and innovative science, technology and innovation (News Article, 14 October 2025, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation). Recuperado de: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/g20-ministers-commit-global-science-cooperation-eus-leading-role-instrumental-advancing-sustainable-2025-10-14_en.
Comisión Europea (s/f). Open Science – The EU’s open science policy. Recuperado de: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/our-digital-future/open-science_en.
David, K. & Thompson, P. B. (Eds.) (2008). What Can Nanotechnology Learn from Biotechnology? Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience from the Debate over Agrifood Biotechnology and GMOs. Ámsterdam: Academic Press.
Doezema, T., Ludwig, D., Macnaghten, P., Shelley-Egan, C. & Forsberg, E. M. (2019). Translation, transduction, and transformation: expanding practices of responsibility across borders. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 323-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.
Einsiedel, E. F. & Goldenberg, L. (2004). Dwarfing the Social? Nanotechnology Lessons from the Biotechnology Front. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(1), 28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604263110.
Elizalde, J. (1998). General Introduction: ELSA in F.P. 4, European Commission, E(thical), L(egal) and S(ocial) A(spects) of the Life Sciences and Technologies Programmes of Framework Programme IV. Catalogue of Contracts. EUR 18309. Bruselas.
Felitti, K. (2012). La revolución de la píldora: Sexualidad y política en los sesenta. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P. B. et al. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission (EUR 22700). Bruselas: Comisión Europea. Recuperado de: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5d0e77c7-2948-4ef5-aec7-bd18efe3c442.
Gao, L., Liao, M. & Zhao, Y. (2019). Exploring complexity, variety and the necessity of RRI in a developing country: the case of China. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 368-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603572.
Gatew, H. & Mengistu, K. (2019). Genetically modified foods (GMOs); a review of genetic engineering. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 9(6), 157-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36380/scil.2019.jlsb25.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Greely, H. T. (1998). Legal, Ethical, and Social Iissues in Human Genome Research.Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 473-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.473.
Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
Kinchy, A. (2012). Seeds, Science, and Struggle: The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9099.001.0001.
Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B., Macnaghten, P. & Leeuwis, C. (2022). Making knowledge work differently: The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation. En D. Ludwig, B. Boogaard, P. Macnaghten & C. Leeuwis (Eds.), The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation (1-16). Abingdon & Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003112525-1.
McAfee, K. (2008). Beyond techno-science: Transgenic maize in the fight over Mexico’s future. Geoforum, 39(1), 148-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.002.
Molak, V. (Ed.) (1997). Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
Owen, R., Bessant, J. R. & Heintz, M. (Eds.) (2013), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.
Pandey, P. (2024). Responsible innovation goes south: critique, othering, and a commitment to care. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2295594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2295594.
Pansera, M. & Owen, R. (2020). Multiplicidad interpretativa en las prácticas de investigación e innovación responsables en 12 países: análisis y resultados. Caleidoscopio - Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 24(43), 23-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33064/43crscsh1980.
Piaz, A. (2024). Movimientos antinucleares en América Latina: el “no a la central” en la Patagonia Argentina. Polis (Santiago), 23(68), 245-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-6568/2024-n68-3302.
Rip, A. (1986). The Mutual Dependence of Risk Research and Political Context. Science & Technology Studies, 4(3/4), 3-15. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/690407.
Schot, J. & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Srinivas, K. R. (2022). Responsible Research and Innovation and India: A Case for Contextualization and Mutual Learning. En D. O’Mathúna & R. Iphofen (Eds.), Ethics, Integrity and Policymaking: The Value of the Case Study (29-48). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15746-2_3.
Stirling, A. (2024). Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality: opening up ‘innovation democracies’ for sustainability transformations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2370082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2370082.
van Oudheusden, M. & Shelley-Egan, C. (2021). RRI Futures: learning from a diversity of voices and visions. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8(2), 139-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1989656.
Vasen, F. (2017). Responsible Innovation in Developing Countries: An Enlarged Agenda. En L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 3: An European Agenda? (93-109). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_6.
von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. En R. Owen, J. R. Bessant y M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (51-74). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.
von Schomberg, R. (2024). Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science? Merton Revisited and the Prospects of Institutionalizing the Research Values of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness. NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation, 6, 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95874.
von Schomberg, R. & Hankins, J. (Eds.) (2019). International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.
Watkins, E. S. (2012). How the Pill Became a Lifestyle Drug: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Birth Control in the United States Since 1960. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1462-1472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300706.
Zwart, H. & Nelis, A. (2009). What is ELSA genomics? EMBO reports, 10(6), 540-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CC Attribution 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.
