Co-Production of Knowledge: The Case of the Argentine Quarterly Meeting on Climate Outlook

Authors

  • María Inés Carabajal CONICET

Keywords:

climate services, co-production of knowledge, interaction, collaboration

Abstract

This paper documents a space for the co-production of knowledge known as quaterly meetings on climate outlook, organized by Argentina's National Weather Service (SMN, due to the initials in Spanish). During the meeting, a climate forecast is made with the participation of diverse operational, governmental and scientific institutions that produce and use different aspects of the information, ir order to assist decision making. This paper presents the genesis and evolution of the meetings, showing how the SMN's openness to the users' participation gives a framework of legitimacy, recognition and authority to the entity’s practices of knowledge co-production. The paper also describes the organization of the meetings and shows how these exchanges foster the establishment of collaboration networks through formal integration agreements. Finally, it addresses the tensions that emerge as a result of the frequent and systematic interactions between institutions of different natures in order to co-produce socially relevant knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Inés Carabajal, CONICET

Becaria posdoctoral del CONICET, Argentina.

References

AGRAWALA, S., BROAD, K., y GUSTON, D. H. (2001): “Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization”, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 26, n° 4, pp. 454–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600404.

BAETHGEN, W. E., CARRIQUIRY, M. y ROPELEWSK, C. (2009): “Tilting the odds in maize yields: How climate information can help manage risks”, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 90, n° 2, pp. 179–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2429.1.

BALMER, A. et al. (2015): “Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community”, Science & Technology Studies, vol. 28, nº 3, pp. 3-25.

BREMER, S. y MEISCH, S. (2017): “Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives”, WIREs Clim Change, n° 482. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.482.

CAMILLONI, I. y VERA, C. (2007): El aire y el agua en nuestro planeta, Buenos Aires, Eudeba.

CARABAJAL, M. I. (2016): “Servicios climáticos y producción de conocimiento científico útil: estudio de caso en una comunidad climática de Argentina”, Cuadernos de Antropología Social. Dossier Antropología de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, n° 43, pp. 33-49. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-275X2016000100005&lng=es&nrm=iso>. Consultado el 30 de enero de 2019.

CARABAJAL, M. I. e HIDALGO, C. (2020): “Making Sense of Climate Science: From Climate Knowledge to Decision Making”, en P. Sillitoe (ed.): The Anthroposcene of Weather and Climate: Ethnographic Contributions to the Climate Change Debate, Londres, Berghahn Books.

CASH, D. W. y BUIZER, J. (2005): “Knowledge-Action Systems for Seasonal to Interannual Climate Forecasting: Summary of a Workshop”, Roundtable on Science and Technology for Sustainability.

CASH, D. W., CLARK, W. C., ALCOCK, F., DICKSON, N. M., ECKLEY, N., GUSTON, D. H. y MITCHELL, R. B. (2003): “Knowledge systems for sustainable development”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, n°14, pp. 8086–8091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100.

DILLING, L. y LEMOS, M. C. (2011): “Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy”, Global Environmental Change, vol. 21, n° 2, pp. 680–689.

EDWARS, P. (2010): A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming, Cambridge, The MIT Press.

FISCHER, M. M. J. (2007). "Four genealogies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology”, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 22, n°4, pp. 539–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.

FUNTOWICZ, S. e HIDALGO, C. (2008): “Ciencia y política con la gente en tiempos de incertidumbre, conflicto de intereses e indeterminación”, en J. A. López Cerezo y F. J. Gómez González (coords.): Apropiación social de la ciencia, Madrid, Nueva.

GARCIA, R. (2006): Sistemas complejos. Conceptos, método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigación interdisciplinaria, Barcelona, Gedisa.

HIDALGO, C. y NATENZON, C E. (2014): “Apropiación social de la ciencia: toma de decisiones y provisión de servicios climáticos a sectores sensibles al clima en el sudeste de América del Sur”, Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad, vol. 9, n° 25, pp. 133-145. Disponible en: http://www.revistacts.net/volumen-9-numero-25/137-dossier/582-apropiacion-social-de-la-ciencia-toma-de-decisiones-y-provision-de-servicios-climaticos-a-sectores-sensibles-al-clima-en-el-sudeste-de-america-del-sur.

HIDALGO, C. (2018): “El giro colaborativo en las ciencias del clima: obstáculos para la provisión de servicios en Sudamérica climáticos y cómo superarlos”, en C. Hidalgo, B. Vienni y C. Simon (eds.): Encrucijadas Interdisciplinarias, Buenos Aires, CICCUS-CLACSO.

HIDALGO, C. y CARABAJAL, M. I. (2018): "Dialogo inter/transdicisplinario en acción: servicios climáticos para el sur de Sudamérica", Climacom, dossier Inter/transdisciplina, año 5, n°13. Disponible en: http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/?p=10037.

HOV, Ø. et al. (2017): "Five priorities for weather and climate research", Nature, n° 168, vol. 552, pp. 168-170.

JASANOFF, S. (2006): States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order, Londres, Routledge.

KIRCHHOFF, C. J., LEMOS, M. C. y DESSAI, S. (2013): “Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol 38, n° 1, pp. 393–414.

LEMOS, M. et al. (2018): “To co-produce or not to co-produce”, Nature sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 722-724.

LEMOS, M. C. y MOREHOUSE, B. J. (2005): “The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments”, Global Environmental Change, vol 15, n° 1, pp. 57–68.

MEADOW, D., FERGUSON, D., ZACK, G., HORANGIC, A. y OWEN, G. (2015): “Moving toward the Deliberate Coproduction of climate science knowledge”, Weather, Climate, and Society, vol 7, n° 2, pp. 179-191.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2001): A Climate Services Vision: First Steps Toward the Future. Disponible en: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10198.html.

PORTER, J. y DESSAI, S. (2017). "Mini-me: Why do climate scientists' misunderstand users and their needs?", Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 77, pp 9-14.

RAYNER, S., LACH, D. e INGRAM, H. (2005): "Weather forecasts are for wimps: Why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts", Climatic Change, vol. 69, n° 2–3), pp. 197–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-3148-z.

REBOLLEDO, M. A. (2009): El tiempo, el Clima y el aire que respiramos, Ciudad de Buenos Aires.

RONCOLI, C. (2006): "Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers; responses to climate predictions", Climate Research, vol. 33, pp. 81–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr033081.

STELLA, J. L. y SKANSI, M. (2018): "Analisis cuantitativo del pronóstico climático probabilístico por consenso del Servicio Meteorológico Nacional", póster, CONGREMET XII. Disponible en: http://cenamet.org.ar/congremet/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/T0094_STELLA.pdf.

SRINIVASAN, G., RAFISURA, K. M. y SUBBIAH, A. R. (2011): “Climate information requirements for community-level risk management and adaptation”, Climate Research, vol. 47, n° 1–2, pp. 5–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00962.

TADDEI, R. (2008): "A comunicacao social de informacoes sobre tempo e clima: o ponto de vista do usuario", Boletim SBMET, agosto-diciembre, pp. 76–86.

TADDEI, R. (2017): Meteorologistas e profetas da chuva conhecimentos, praticas e politicas da atmosfera, San Pablo, Terceiro Nome.

VAUGHAN, C. y DESSAI, S. (2014): “Climate services for society: Origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 5, n° 5, pp. 587–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.290.

WEAVER, C., MOONEY, S., ALLEN, D., BELLER SIMMS, N., FISH, T., GRAMBUSCH, E. y JACOBS, M. (2014). “From global change science to action with social sciences”, Nature Climate Change, vol. 4, pp. 656–659.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-26

How to Cite

Carabajal, M. I. (2020). Co-Production of Knowledge: The Case of the Argentine Quarterly Meeting on Climate Outlook. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 15(44). Retrieved from https://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/164

Issue

Section

Articles