Science Communication on Nanotechnology in the Brazilian Media

Authors

  • Clecí Körbes Federal University of Paraná
  • Noela Invernizzi Federal University of Paraná

Keywords:

science communication, media, nanotechnology, public policies

Abstract

This paper examines the communication on nanotechnology in Brazilian media associated to the interests and values of different social groups, and explores which kind of communication models they use and which kind of contents they privilege. Three different media were analysed: the science features of the broadcast TV show Bom Dia Brasil (“Good Morning Brazil”); the science column of the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper; and a non-random sample of Nanotecnologia do Avesso (“Nanotechnology Inside Out”), a chat show on web TV. The timeframe was established between 2008 and 2010, a period that follows the four best-financed years of Brazilian nanotechnology policy, after the launching of a national program in 2004. The methodological approach was quantitative and qualitative content analysis. The study concluded that communication of nanotechnology in Brazilian media is characterized by tensions and polarisations. On the one hand, the conventional media support the stabilisation of nanotechnology and emphasise its potential for innovation with discourses based on linear models. On the other hand, the alternative media expose the instability of nanotechnology, accentuate its risks with dystopic discourses and highlight the need for the application of the precautionary principle and the establishment of regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Clecí Körbes, Federal University of Paraná

Professor, Professional and Technological Education Department, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

Noela Invernizzi, Federal University of Paraná

Associate Professor, Education Department and Post-Graduate Program in Public Politics, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

References

AMORIM, T. de. (2008): “Nanotecnologia na imprensa: análise de conteúdo do jornal Folha de São Paulo”, Em Tese, vol. 4, nº 2, pp. 20-36.

ANDRADE, F. G. (2010): O Jornal do Futuro, Documentary, São Paulo, Spray Filmes.

BARDIN, L. (1977): Análise de conteúdo, Lisbon, PT, Edições 70.

CASTELLS, M. (2012): Comunicación y poder, México, Siglo XXI.

CRONE, W. C. (2006): “Bringing nano to the public: a collaboration opportunity for researchers and museums”, in S. E. Koch (ed.): NISE Network, St. Paul, MN, Science Museum of Minnesota.

DIAS, R. B. (2012): Sessenta anos de política científica e tecnológica no Brasil, Campinas, SP, Editora da Unicamp.

DUPUY, J. P. (2008): “Foreword: The double language of science, and why it is so difficult to have a proper public debate about the nanotechnology program”, in F. Alltoff F. and P. Lin (eds.): Nanotechnology & Society, Current and Emerging Ethical Issues, Springer.

FABER, B. (2006): “Popularizing Nanoscience: The Public Rhetoric of Nanotechnology, 1986-1999”, Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 15, nº 2, pp. 141-169.

FIEDELER, U., GRUNWALD, A. and COENEN, C. (2005): “Vision assessment in the field of nanotechnology – a first approach, in: Conference Imaging Nanospace, Bielefeld, Germany, pp. 1-4.

GASKELL, G., EYCK, T. T., JACKSON, J. and VELTRI, G. (2005): “Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States”, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 81-90.

GOMES, I. M. de A. M. (2000): A divulgação científica em Ciência Hoje: características discursivo-textuais, Doctoral Thesis in Letters, 305p, Recife, Graduate Program in Letters, UFPE.

IBOPE (2012): Cresce uso de banda larga no Brasil: mais de 40% dos usuários conectam-se com velocidade superior a 2 Mb. Brasil, july 30. Disponível em: http://www.ibope.com.br/pt-br/relacionamento/imprensa/releases/paginas/cresce-uso-de-banda-larga-no-brasil.aspx. Date of reference: 27 August, 2012.

INVERNIZZI, N. (2008): “Visions of Brazilian Scientists on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies”, Nanoethics, vol. 2, nº 2, pp. 133-148.

INVERNIZZI, N. and CAVICHIOLO, C. (2009): “Nanotecnologia en los médios: qué información llega al público?”, Redes, vol. 15, nº 29, pp. 139-175.

INVERNIZZI, N. and FOLADORI, G. (2012): “Hacia donde van las nanotecnologias en América Latina?”, in G. Foladori, N. Invernizzi and E. Z. Záyago (eds.): Perspectivas sobre el desarrollo de las nanotecnologías en América Latina, Mexico, DF, M.A. Porrúa, pp. 229-233.

INVERNIZZI, N., KÖRBES, C. and FUCK, M. P. (2012): “Política de nanotecnología en Brasil: a 10 años de las primeras redes”, in G. Foladori, N. Invernizzi, and E. Z. Záyago (eds.): Perspectivas sobre el desarrollo de las nanotecnologías en América Latina, Mexico, M.A. Porrúa, pp. 55-84.

KÖRBES, C. (2013): Educação não-formal em mídias: divulgação científica sobre nanotecnologia, 319p, Doctoral Thesis in Technology, Graduate Program in Technology, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.

KRABBENBORG, L. and MULDER, H. A. J. (2015): “Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology: Constraints and Opportunities”, Science Communication, vol. 37, nº 4, pp. 452-484.

KURATH, M. and GISLER, P. (2009): “Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology”, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 18, nº 5, pp. 559-573.

LACOUR, S. and VINCK, D. (2011): Nanoparticles, nanomaterials, what are we talking about? Socio-legal views on constructing the object of regulation in the field of ‘nano’ risks, Paris, INRS.

LEWENSTEIN, B. V. (2003, Jun. 16): “Models of Public Communication of Science &Technology”, Public Understanding of Science, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University.

LÖSCH, A. (2006): “Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: Visionary images as means of communication”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 18, nº 3, pp. 393-409.

MACNAGHTEN, P. and GUIVANT, J. S. (2011): “Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom”, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 20, nº 2, pp. 207-220.

MARTINS, P. R. (2013): O programa Nanotecnologia do Avesso e o projeto Engajamento Público em Nanotecnologia, São Paulo.

MARTINS, P. R. and FERNANDES, M. F. M. (2011): “Nanotecnologia do Avesso: uma experiência de engajamento público em ciência e tecnologia”, Revista Brasileira de Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade, vol. 2, nº 1, pp. 109-119.

MARX, L. and SMITH, M. R. (1996): Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

MASAMI, M., HUNT, G. and MASAYUKI, O. (2008): “Nanotechnologies and society in Japan”, in G. Hunt and M. D. Mehta (eds.): Nanotechnology Risk, Ethics and Law, London; Sterling, VA, Earthscan, pp. 59-73.

MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2003): Desenvolvimento da Nanociência e da Nanotecnologia. Proposta do Grupo de Trabalho criado pela Portaria MCT nº 252 como subsídio ao Programa de Desenvolvimento da Nanociência e da Nanotecnologia do PPA 2004-2007, Brasília/DF.

MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2011): Percepção pública da ciência e tecnologia no Brasil. Resultados da enquete de 2010, Brasília/DF.

MORAES, R. (1999): “Análise de conteúdo”, Revista Educação, vol. 22, nº 37, pp. 7-32.

PRIEST, S. (2008): “Biotechnology, nanotechnology, media, and public opinion”, in K. H. David and P. B. Thompson (eds.): What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?, Amsterdan, Elsevier, Boston, Academic Press, pp. 221-234.

RS and RAE (2004): Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertaintie, London, The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering.

RETZBACH, A. and MAIER, M. (2015): “Communicating scientific uncertainty”, Communication Research, vol. 42, nº 3, pp. 429-456.

RIBEIRO, D. C. (2009): WebTV: Perspectivas para construções sociais coletivas, Biblioteca on-line de ciências da comunicação. Available at: http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/. Date of reference: August 28, 2012.

SÁNCHEZ-MORA, M. C. and PARGA, J. T. (2011): “El manejo de las escalas como obstáculo epistemológico en la divulgación de la nanociencia”, Mundo Nano, vol. 4, nº 2, pp. 83-102.

SEVERINO, A. J. (1992): “O projeto político-pedagógico: a saída para a escola”, Revista da AEC, vol. 27, nº 107, pp. 81-91.

STEPHENS, L. F. (2005): “News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers”, Science Communication, vol. 27, nº 2, pp. 175-199.

THOMAS, H. (2011): “Tecnologías sociales y ciudadanía sócio-tecnica. Notas para la construcción de la matriz material de un futuro viable”, Ciência & Tecnologia Social, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 1-22.

TYSHENKO, M. G. (2014): “Nanotechnology framing in the Canadian national news media”, Technology in Society, vol. 37, pp. 38-48.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-26

How to Cite

Körbes, C., & Invernizzi, N. (2020). Science Communication on Nanotechnology in the Brazilian Media. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 15(45). Retrieved from https://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/173

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 45 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.

Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.

In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after  the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.