Artificial Intelligence and Biases

Predicting Adolescent Pregnancy in Salta

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-359

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithm, biases, value neutrality, public policies

Abstract

Faced with the rhetoric of an efficient and free of prejudice artificial intelligence (AI), this article discusses why this popular vision is inadequate and examines some of its shifts in the design of public policies. Firstly, we argue that it is impossible –in principle– to propose a value-neutral AI, based on what has been indicated by some canonical and contemporary philosophical contributions. In the second section we analyze a case that clearly illustrates the value burden that gravitates on AI. This will lead us to investigate, in the third section, the different levels at which biases can have an influence on AI. Our main objective is to unveil the paradox related to how the application of AI in public policies and private spheres, far from being a tool to combat structural inequalities, ends up consolidating harmful scenarios for vulnerable populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Karina Pedace, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza

Associate professor at the National University of La Matanza (UNLAM), head of practical works at the University of Buenos Aires (UBA) and researcher at IIF-SADAF-CONICET, Argentina.

Tobías Schleider, Universidad Nacional del Sur

Professor and researcher at the National Southern University (UNS) and head of practical works at the National University of Mar del Plata (UNMDP), Argentina. Researcher at UNMDP, UNS and the Latin American Institute for Security and Democracy (ILSED).

Tomás Balmaceda, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Head of practical works at the University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. Associate professor at the University of Business and Social Sciences (UCES), Argentina. Researcher at IIF-SADAF-CONICET, Argentina.

References

Albino, A (2010). Gobernar es poblar. Criterios antropológicos y éticos para una correcta educación sexual. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Logos.

Burgues, C. J. C. (2010). From RankNet to LambdaRank to LambdaMART: An Overview. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2010-82. Recuperado de: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/MSR-TR-2010-82.pdf

Carroll, W. (2001). I, Toto: The Autobiography of Terry, the Dog who was Toto. Nueva York: Abrams.

Danesi, C. C. (2021). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women’s Rights: A Legal Point of View. En K. Miller & K. Wendt (Eds.), The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Ethics. Sustainable Finance (267-282). Cham: Springer.

DEIS (2017). Estadísticas vitales 2017. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Recuperado de: http://www.deis.msal.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Serie5Nro61.pdf

Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. Londres: Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.

Haraway, D. (2019). Seguir con el problema. Generar parentesco en el Chthuluceno. Bilbao: Consonni.

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles: Sage.

LIAA (2018). Sobre la predicción automática de embarazos adolescentes. Laboratorio de Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada (LIAA). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recuperado de: https://liaa.dc.uba.ar/es/sobre-la-prediccion-automatica-de-embarazos-adolescentes/

Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Martínez Elebi, C. (2020). Inteligencia artificial y salud. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios en Tecnología y Sociedad (CETyS). Recuperado de: https://cetys.lat/inteligencia-artificial-y-salud/

Mallimaci, F., Giménez Béliveau, V., Esquivel, J. C. E. & Irrazábal, G. (2019). Sociedad y Religión en Movimiento. Segunda Encuesta Nacional sobre Creencias y Actitudes Religiosas en la Argentina. Informe de Investigación 25. Buenos Aires: CEIL-CONICET. Recuperado de: http://www.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ii25-2encuestacreencias.pdf

Microsoft (2018). Avanza el uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Argentina con experiencias en el sector público, privado y ONGs. Blog News Center Microsoft Latinoamérica. Recuperado de: https://news.microsoft.com/es-xl/avanza-el-uso-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-en-la-argentina-con-experiencias-en-el-sector-publico-privado-y-ongs/

Ortiz Freuler, J. & Iglesias, C. (2018). Algoritmos e Inteligencia Artificial en Latinoamérica: un estudio de implementaciones por parte de Gobiernos en Argentina y Uruguay. Washington: World Wide Web Foundation.

Página 12 (2018). La inteligencia artificial de Urtubey. 11 de abril. Recuperado de: https://www.pagina12.com.ar/107412-la-inteligencia-artificial-de-urtubey

Pasquinelli, M. & Joler, V. (2021). El Nooscopio de manifiesto. laFuga 25, pp.1-20.

Pedace, K., Balmaceda, T. Pérez, D. Lawler, D. Zeller Echenique, M. (2020). Caja de herramientas humanísticas. Recuperado de: https://proyectoguia.lat/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Caja-de-herramientas-Humanistas.pdf

Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shannon, C. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.

Ramallo, F. (2018). Cómo funciona el sistema para “predecir embarazos adolescentes” de Salta. Entrevista a Pablo Abelira, Coordinador de tecnología del Ministerio de Primera Infancai de Salta. Diario Uno, 12 de abril. Recuperado de: https://uno.com.ar/tecnologia/como-funciona-el-sistema-para-predecir-embarazos-adolescentes-de-salta-04122018_rJxfqbraiM

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. Nueva York: Macmillan Co.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Pedace, K., Schleider, T., & Balmaceda, T. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Biases: Predicting Adolescent Pregnancy in Salta. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 18(53), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-359

Issue

Section

Articles