Is there Room for Other-than-Human Agency in Transdisciplinary Research?
An Ethnographic Reflection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-380Keywords:
co-production, transdisciplinary research, other-than-human agency, indigenous knowledge, IPCCAbstract
The article argues that most of the debates on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and co-production focus solely on human actors and human agency and, as a result, fail to acknowledge the role of other-than-human agency in fields where it plays a central role, environmental governance being one of them. Two cases are presented and analyzed. In the first, climate scientists and technicians in South America co-produce solutions for an environmental crisis brought about by a drought. The article argues that the drought was what enabled coproduction to happen meaningfully. The second contrasts the thinking of Yanomami Indigenous author and shaman Davi Kopenawa about the environment and the agencies involved in shamanistic action with the ontological basis of the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in which the integration of Indigenous knowledge has been a goal for over a decade. Based on the analysis of these cases, it is argued that other-than-human agencies need to be recognized in environmental governance.
Downloads
References
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Bremer, S. & Meisch, S. (2017). Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives. WIREs Clim Change, 8: e482. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.482.
Carmona, R., MacDonald, J. P., Dorough, D. S., Rai, T. B., Sanago, G. A. & Thorsell, S. (2022a). Recognising the contributions of Indigenous Peoples in global climate action. An analysis of the IPCC report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IWGIA Briefing Paper, March 2022.
Carmona, R., MacDonald, J. P., Dorough, D. S., Rai, T. B., Sanago, G. A. & Thorsell, S. (2022b). A new paradigm of climate partnership with Indigenous Peoples. An analysis of the recognition of Indigenous Peoples in the IPCC report on mitigation. IWGIA Briefing Paper, June 2022.
Chambers, J. M., Wyborn, C. & Ryan, M. E. et al. (2021). Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nat Sustain, 4, 983–996. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x.
Cointe, B. (2023). Scenarios. In Pryck, K. and Hulme, M. (orgs.), A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (137–147). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deloria Jr., V. (1969). Custer Died For Your Sins; An Indian Manifesto. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Edwards, P. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ferdinand, M. (2019). Une écologie décoloniale. Penser l’écologie depuis le monde caribéen. Paris: Seuil.
Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guáqueta-Solórzano, V-E. & Postigo, J.C. (2022). Indigenous perceptions and adaptive responses to the impacts of climate variability in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Frontiers in Climate, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2022.910294.
Guarani, J. (2022). Becoming Savage. Futuress, April 22, 2022. Available at: https://futuress.org/stories/becoming-savage/.
Guillemot, H. (2023). Climate Models. In K. Pryck & M. Hulme (Orgs.), A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (126–136). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
ICC (2022). Inuit Circumpolar Council, first Indigenous Peoples Organization to formally participate as an Observer at the IPCC. Press release, March 1, 2022. Available at: https://www.inuitcircumpolar.com/news/inuit-circumpolar-council-first-indigenous-peoples-organization-to-formally-participate-as-an-observer-at-the-ipcc/; accessed on February 16, 2023.
IPBES (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.
IPCC (2019). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157964.
IPCC (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 3-33. DOI: 10.1017/9781009325844.001.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Kopenawa, D. & Albert, B. (2013). The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krenak, A. (2021). Ideas to Postpone the End of the World. Toronto: House of Anansi Press Inc.
Latour, B (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2009). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Malden: Polity Press.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Miguel, J. C. H., Taddei, R. & Figueiredo, F. S. (2021). Coronavirus, infrastructures and the sociotechnical (dis)entanglements in Brazil. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4, p. 100146.
Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences: A 1981 overview. Issues in Integrative Studies, 1, 1–37.
Nissani, M. (1995). Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET), 29(2), 121–128.
Reyes-García, V., Tofighi-Niaki, A., Austin, B. J., Benyei, P., Danielsen, F., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Sharma, A., Soleymani-Fard, R. & Tengö, Ma. (2022). Data sovereignty in community-based environmental monitoring: Toward equitable environmental data governance. BioScience, biac048. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac048.
Reyes-García, V, Álvarez-Fernández, S., Benyei, P., García-del-Amo, D., Junqueira, A. B. & Labeyrie, V. et al. (2023). Local indicators of climate change impacts described by indigenous peoples and local communities: Study protocol. PLoS ONE, 18(1), e0279847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279847.
Standring, A. (2023). Participant diversity. In K. Pryck & M. Hulme (Orgs.), A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (61-70). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stengers, I. (2015). In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Open Humanities Press.
Taddei, R. (2017). Meteorologistas e Profetas da Chuva: Conhecimentos, Práticas e Políticas da Atmosfera. São Paulo: Terceiro Nome.
Taddei, R. (2020). Anthropology and the pragmatics of climate knowledge in Brazil. American Anthropologist, 122, 944–947.
Taddei, R. (2023). Kopenawa and the environmental sciences in the Amazon. In N. Bubandt & T. S. Wentzer (Eds.), Philosophy on Fieldwork: Case Studies in Anthropological Analysis (353-372). London: Routledge.
Taddei, R., Shiratori, K. & Bulamah, R. C. (2022). Decolonizing the Anthropocene. In H. Callan & S. Coleman (Orgs.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1, 1-12. London: Wiley.
Van Bavel, B., MacDonald, J. P. & Dorough, D. S. (2023). Indigenous Knowledge Systems In K. Pryck & M. Hulme (Orgs.), A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (116–125). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vienni-Baptista, B. (2023). Disentangling Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity: The Beauty of Differing Definitions. In O. Pombo, K. Gärtner & J. Jesuíno (Eds.), Theory and Practice in the Interdisciplinary Production and Reproduction of Scientific Knowledge. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20405-0_2.
Vienni-Baptista, B. I., Fletcher, C. Lyall & Pohl, C. (2022). Embracing heterogeneity: Why plural understandings strengthen interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. Science and Public Policy, 49, 865–877. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scac034.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Cannibal Metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 CC Attribution 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.
