Do Scientists Solve or Create New Social Problems?

The Development of Fisheries Biology in Brazil (1967-1978)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-412

Keywords:

scientific problems, public problems, Fisheries Development Program, Brazil, FAO

Abstract

The belief that science can provide objective solutions to public problems dates back to the 17th century. Faced with this belief, some studies investigated how to improve knowledge production processes to guide them towards the solution of public problems. In this article we invert the question: how does scientific knowledge participate in the construction of new public problems? We will argue that scientists participate, along with other social actors, in defining what is a public problem and what are its objective solutions. We will study the Fisheries Development Program (PDP) (1967-1978), signed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and Brazil. The case is relevant because it was intended to increase fishery production to end hunger in the world. However, it contributed to the development of a fishing model based on the export of “fine” products to central markets. We will argue that the usefulness of knowledge is explained by the close relationship between the problems of industrial fishing and the problems of the PDP fishery biologists. To this end, we take up contributions from the social studies of science, the sociology of social problems, and field science studies. As for empirical material, we will consider the reports written and signed by the PDP fisheries biologists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ezequiel Sosiuk, Maimonides University

Master in science, technology and society, National University of Quilmes (UNQ), Argentina. PhD in social sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. CONICET postdoctoral fellow and researcher at the Center for Science, Technology and Society of the Maimonides University (UMAI), Argentina.

References

Armstrong, M. J., Payne, A. I. & Cotter, A. J. R. (2008). Contributions of the fishing industry to research through partnerships. En A. Payne, J. Cotter & T. Potter (Eds.), Advances in Fisheries Science. 50 years on from Beverton and Holt (63-85). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Bartley, T. (2007). How foundations shape social movements: The construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems, 54(3), 229-255. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.3.229.

Bloor, D. (1976). Conocimiento e imaginario social. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Browne, J. (1992). A science of empire: British biogeography before Darwin. Revue d'histoire des sciences, 453-475.

Campling, L. & Havice, E. (2018). The global environmental politics and political economy of seafood systems. Global Environmental Politics, 18(2), 72-92. DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00453.

Cyrino, C. O. S. C. (2021). Modernização e segregação: a pesca artesanal no projeto nacional-desenvolvimentista. Simbiótica. Revista Eletrônica, 8(1), 110-132. DOI: 10.47456/simbitica.v8i1.35435.

de Faria, F. O. S. & Slack-Smith, R. J. (1976). Relatorio da reuniao do grupo de trabalho para avaliacao preliminar da pesca de piramatuba. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP nº 16, 1-55. Brasilia: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

de Moura, S. J. C., Barcellos, B. N., Tremel, E., da Silva, O. & Grafulha, J. L. L. (1968). Walter Herwig na costa atlántica da América do Sul. Pesca y Pesquisa, 1(1), 44. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Devold, F. (1958). Report to the government of Brazil on fishery biology. Based on the work of Finn Devold, FAO/ETAP fisheries biologist Rep. FAO/ETAP nº 798, 1-33.

Dias-Neto, J. (2003). Gestão do uso dos recursos pesqueiros marinhos no Brasil. Brasilia: Edições IBAMA.

Diegues, A. C. S. (1983). Pescadores, camponeses e trabalhadores do mar. San Pablo: Ática.

FAO/UN (1966). Report to the Government of Brazil on development of the marine fisheries biology research program. Based on the work of F.M. Frantzen, FAO/TA associate marine fishery biologist. FAO/UNDP(TA) nº TA 2173, 1-7.

Fernandes, P. G., Gerlotto, F., Holliday, D. V., Nakken, O. & Simmonds, E. J. (2002). Acoustic applications in fisheries science: the ICES contribution. Marine Science Symposia, 215, 483-492.

Finley, C. (2011). All the Fish in the Sea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

García, S. M. (1992). Ocean Fisheries Management. The FAO Programme. Conference on Ocean Management in Global Change, Genoa, 22-26 de junio.

Giulietti, N. & Assumpção, R. d. (1995). Indústria pesqueira no Brasil. Agricultura em São Paulo, 42(2), 95-127.

Goularti Filho, A. (2016). Da SUDEPE à criação da secretaria especial de aquicultura e pesca: as políticas públicas voltadas às atividades pesqueiras no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, (49).

Gusfield, J. (1984). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haimovici, M. (2007). A prospecção pesqueira e abundância de estoques marinhos no Brasil nas décadas de 1960 a 1990. Levantamento de dados e avaliação crítica. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente-Programa REVIZEE.

Hubbard, J. (2014). In the wake of politics: The political and economic construction of fisheries biology, 1860–1970. Isis, 105(2), 364-378. DOI: 10.1086/676572.

Iñigo Carrera, J. (2008). El capital: razón histórica, sujeto revolucionario y conciencia. Imago Mundi.

Jachertz, R. & Nützenadel, A. (2011). Coping with hunger? Visions of a global food system, 1930–1960. Journal of Global History, 6(1), 99-119. DOI: 10.1017/S1740022811000064.

Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.

Kitsuse, J. I. & Spector, M. (1973). Toward a sociology of social problems: Social conditions, value-judgments, and social problems. Social Problems, 20(4), 407-419.

Kohler, R. E. (2002). Place and practice in field biology. History of Science, 40(2), 189-210.

Knorr Cetina, K. (1996). ¿Comunidades científicas o arenas transepistémicas de investigación? Una crítica de los modelos cuasi-económicos de la ciencia. REDES, 3(7), 129-70.

Kreimer, P. & Zabala, J. P. (2008). Quelle connaissance et pour qui? Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, 2(3), 413-439. DOI: 10.3917/rac.005.0413.

Larkin, P. A. (1977). An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield. Transactions of the American fisheries society, 106(1), 1-11.

Lefèvre, W. (2005). Science as labor. Perspectives on Science, 13(2), 194-225. DOI: 10.1162/106361405774270539.

Lerena, C. A. (2009). Malvinas, biografía de la entrega: pesca, la moneda de cambio. Buenos Aires: Bouquet Editores.

Lindner, M. J. (1957). Survey of shrimp fisheries of Central and South America, 235, 1-58, US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Mansfield, B. (2004). Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 565-584. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00414.x.

Martins, A. (2018). O mar de todos: relações entre conservação marinha e gestão pesqueira no Brasil [Tesis de doctorado]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Martins, C. A. A. (2006). Indústria da pesca no Brasil: o uso do território por empresas de enlatamento de pescado [Tesis de doctorado]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Martin, A. & Lynch, M. (2009). Counting things and people: The practices and politics of counting. Social Problems, 56(2), 243-266. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.243.

Mendonca Leão, M. & Maluf, R. S. (2012). Effective public policies and active citizenship: Brazil's experience of building a food and nutrition security system. Brasilia: ABRANDH.

Merton, R. K. (1938). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. Osiris, 4, 360-632.

Metcalfe, J. D., Righton, D. A., Hunter, E., Neville, S. & Mills, D. K. (2008). New technologies for the advancement of fisheries science. En A. Payne, J. Cotter & T. Potter (Eds.), Advances in Fisheries Science: 50 Years on From Beverton and Holt (255-280). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Mills, E. L. (2012). Biological oceanography: An early history, 1870-1960. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Muñoz, J. L. (1970). El desarrollo pesquero y la integración regional. Estudios Internacionales, 4(14), 133-149. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Nort, E. (1973). Industrialización de camarón. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP n° 3, 1-12. Rio de Janeiro: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Nort, E., Benedet, H. D. & Machado, R. A. (1977). Técnicas de tratamento e controle da deterioração a bordo e em terra da sardinha "Sardinella brasiliensis". Santa Catarina: SUDEPE y Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina. Recuperado de: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

PDP (1974). Relatorio da primeira reuniao do grupo de trabalho e treinamento (GTT) sobre evaliacao dos estoques. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP nº 7, 1-25. Rio de Janeiro: FAO-SUDEPE.

PDP (1975). Levantamiento hidroacústico dos recursos pesqueiros pelágicos na costa sudeste e sul do Brasil. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP nº 10, 1-10. Rio de Janeiro: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

PDP (1976). Relatório do grupo permanente de estudos sobre camarao. Brasilia: SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

PDP (1977a). Esforço e captura da pesca de covo no litoral basileiro. Série Dados básicos da Pesca nº 2, 1-88). Brasilia: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

PDP (1977b). Relatório preliminar da reuniao do grupo permanente de estudos sobre sardinha. Brasilia: SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

PDP (1978). Sumário dos relatórios das reunioes técnicas do grupo de trabalho sobre a pesca da lagosta no nordeste brasileiro. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP nº 28, 1-88. Rio de Janeiro: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Podgorny, I. & Lopes, M. M. (2014). El desierto en una vitrina. Museos e historia natural en la Argentina (1810-1890). Rosario: Prohistoria.

Poli, C. R. (1973). Projeto Babitonga. Santa Catarina: Acarpesc, SUDEPE & DECP. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Raggi Abdallah, P. & Bacha, C. J. C. (1999). Evolução da atividade pesqueira no Brasil: 1960-1994. Revista Teoria e Evidência Econômica, 7(13).

Ravetz, J. R. (1996). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Nueva York: Routledge.

Roedel, P. M. & Saila, S. B. (1979). Stock assessment for tropical small-scale fisheries. International Workshop, 19-21 de septiembre. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Sahrhage, D., & Lundbeck, J. (2012). A history of fishing. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media.

Schaefer, M. (1954). Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull. Inter-Amer. Trop. Tuna Comm. 1 (2), 27-56.

Serviço Público Federal (1978). Primeira reunião das federações de pesca. Brasilia: SUDEPE, Pescart & CNP. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (2005), El Leviathan y la bomba de vacío. Hobbes, Boyle y la vida experimental. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Staples, A. L. (2003). To Win the Peace: The Food and Agriculture Organization, Sir John Boyd Orr, and the World Food Board Proposals. Peace & Change, 28(4), 495-523. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0130.00273.

Sosiuk, E. (2020). ¿Cuál es el problema? El rol de los científicos en la construcción de problemas sociales ligados a la actividad pesquera en Argentina en el siglo XX [Tesis de doctorado]. Buenos Aires: FSOC-UBA.

SUDEPE (1971). Considerações gerais sobre a composição da carne de pescado e a sua importância na alimentação humana. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

SUDEPE (1979). Plano Anual de Trabalho. Recuperado de: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Sudesul, SUDEPE, CECP & BRDE (1972). Estudos da flota e indústria pesqueira de Santa Catarina. Santa Catarina: Comissão de coordenação do Acordo 02/72. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Thorpe, A., Ibarra, A. A. & Reid, C. (2000). The new economic model and marine fisheries development in Latin America. World Development, 28(9), 1689-1702.

Valentini, H., D'Incao, F., Rodrigues, L. F. & Dumont, L. F. (2012). Evolução da pescaria industrial de camarão-rosa (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis e F. paulensis) na costa sudeste e sul do Brasil–1968-1989. Atlântica (Rio Grande), 34(2), 157-171. DOI: 10.5088/atlântica.v34i2.3177.

Vasconcelos, F. d. A. G. d. (2005). Combate à fome no Brasil: uma análise histórica de Vargas a Lula. Revista de Nutrição, 18(4), 439-457. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-52732005000400001.

Vessuri, H. (2007). "O inventamos o erramos". La ciencia como idea-fuerza en América Latina. Bernal: UNQ.

Walsh, V. M. (2004). Global Institutions and Social Knowledge: Generating Research at the Scripps Institution and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, 1900s-1990s. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Wintersteen, K. (2011). Fishing for Food and Fodder: The Transnational Environmental History of Humboldt Current Fisheries in Peru and Chile since 1945 [Tesis de doctorado]. Durham: Duke University.

Yesaki, M. (1973). Sumario dos levantamentos de pesca exploratoria ao largo da costa sul do Brasil e estimativa da biomassa de peixe demersal e potencial pesqueiro. Série Documentos Técnicos PDP nº 1, 1-68. Rio de Janeiro: FAO-SUDEPE. Recuperado de: www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/acervo-digital.html.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-18

How to Cite

Sosiuk, E. (2023). Do Scientists Solve or Create New Social Problems? The Development of Fisheries Biology in Brazil (1967-1978). Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 19(55), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-412

Issue

Section

Articles