The experience of R&D&I evaluation in universities through the Institutional Evaluation Program (IEP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-587Keywords:
universities, R&D&I, evaluation, technological and social transferAbstract
This article aims to identify some of the difficulties and tensions that arise at Argentine universities as a result of a new context that promotes technologic and social transfer, and innovation. In this context, issues such as autonomy and the social function of the university, the evaluation criteria for scientific and technological activities, planning and freedom of thought, the institutional coordination and management of the research and development function, among others, generate tensions that require a definition. The information provided by the Institutional Assessment Program (PEI) of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation of Argentina is the input chosen to present this scenario.
Downloads
References
BUCHBINDER, P. (2000): Historia de las Universidades Argentinas, Buenos Aires, Sudamericana.
CLARK, B. R. (1983): The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross- National Perspective, Berkeley, The University of California Press.
COHEN, M., MARCH, J. y OLSEN, J. (1972): A Garbage Can Model of Organization Choice, in Administrative Science Quaterly, vol. 17, n° 1, pp. 1-25.
ERGAS, H. (1987): “Does Technology Policy Matter?”, Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy, Washington DC, The National Academies Press.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998): “The endless transition: A “triple helix” of university–industry–government relations”, Minerva, n° 36, pp. 203–208.
GIBBONS, M. (1998): Pertinencia de la Educación Superior en el siglo XXI, París, UNESCO.
KROTSCH, P. (2005): “Identidad de la UBA y marcas de la historia en el presente”, Revista Argumentos, nº 6.
LOVISOLO, H. (1996): “Comunidades científicas y universidades en la Argentina y Brasil”, Redes, vol. 3, n° 8, pp. 47-94.
LUGONES, G. (2012): La educación, el conocimiento y su aplicación en la producción y el empleo nacional, Programa Universidad y Trabajo Argentino en el mundo, Ministerio de Educación, Buenos Aires.
MYERS, J. (1989): “Antecedentes de la conformación del complejo científico y tecnológico, 1850-1958”; en E. Oteiza (ed.): La política de investigación científica y tecnológica argentina: historia y perspectivas, pp. 87-114, CEAL, BuenosAires.
NEAVE, G. (1998): Autonomía, responsabilidad social y libertad académica, Conferencia Mundial sobre la Educación Superior, UNESCO.
NOTCHEFF, H. (1994): “Los senderos perdidos del desarrollo. Elite económica y restricciones al desarrollo en la Argentina”, en D. Azpiazu y H. Nochteff: El desarrollo ausente. Restricciones al desarrollo, neoconservadurismo y elite económica en la Argentina. Ensayos de Economía Política, Tesis/Norma, Buenos Aires.
NUN, J. (1995): “Argentina: El estado y las actividades científicas y tecnológicas”, Redes, vol. 2, nº 3. pp. 59-98, Buenos Aires.
ROMER, P. (1986): “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, nº 5, pp. 1002-1037.
SANYAL, B. C. (1998): Tendencias en la gestión de las Universidades contemporáneas. Evolución y perspectivas, París, UNESCO-IIPE, Instituto Internacional de Planeamiento de la Educación.
VERSINO, M. (2000): “Las incubadoras universitarias de empresas en la Argentina: reflexiones a partir de algunas experiencias recientes”, Redes, vol. 7, nº 15. pp. 151- 181.
VESSURI, H. (1997): “Science in Latin America”, en J. Krige y D. Pestre (eds.): Science in the Twentieth Century, pp. 839-858, París, Harwood Academic Publishers.
VILLANUEVA, E. (2002): “La articulación entre sistema científico y sistema universitario: ¿es un dilema?”, Redes, vol. 10, nº 19. pp. 25-41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CC Attribution 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.
