Engenharia e preocupação social: rumo a novas práticas

Autores

  • Judith Sutz Universidad de la República

Palavras-chave:

determinismo tecnológico, inovação frugal, ação coletiva, ensino CTS, engenharia

Resumo

A partir da constatação de que está ocorrendo uma identificação entre irreversibilidade tecnológica e inevitabilidade tecnológica — isto é, a negação da possibilidade de construir alternativas ao que existe —, este trabalho argumenta que isso não é assim e que tal construção precisa de uma discussão reflexiva de novas práticas no ensino da engenharia. Isso é fundamental para estimular uma preocupação social entre os alunos das áreas científicotécnicas que ajude a enfrentar os desafios da mudança climática, da desigualdade e da deriva antidemocrática na aplicação da informática.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Judith Sutz, Universidad de la República

Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica, Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

Referências

ABROL, D. (2014): “Pro-poor Innovation Making, Knowledge Production, and technology Implementation for Rural Areas: Lessons from the Indian Experience”, Innovation in India. Combining Economic Growth with Inclusive Development, Nueva Delhi, Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-378.

ANDERSEN, E. (1995): Feasibility Study in New Awareness Initiatives, Copenhagen, Danish Board Of Technology.

ASIMOV, I. (1974): Los propios dioses, Madrid, Bruguera.

BRYNJOLFSSON, E. y MC AFEE, A. (2014): The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, Nueva York, Norton and Co.

DAVID, P. (1985) “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY”, The American Economic Review, vol. 75, n° 2, pp. 332-337.

DERTOUZOS, M. L., LESTER, R. K., SOLOW, R. M. y MIT COMMISSION ON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTIVITY (1989): Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge, Cambridge, MIT Press.

EHN, P. (1988): Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Umea University. Disponible en: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:580037/FULLTEXT02.pdf. Consultado el 10 de enero de 2019.

GEIDO, D., FAILACHE, H. y SIMINI, F. (2007): “BiliLED fototerapia neonatal de bajo costo: del prototipo a la producción industrial”, Proceedings of the XVI Congreso Argentino de Bioingeniería, V Jornadas de Ingeniería Clínica, San Juan, Argentina. Disponible en: http://www.nib.fmed.edu.uy/bililed_sabi.pdf. Consultado el 21 de abril de 2019.

GERTH, H. y WRIGHT, C. (1991): From Max Weber, Oxford, Routledge.

GUARGA, R. (2012): “Jornada Técnica: La tecnología SIS aplicada al control y prevención del riesgo de heladas en Uruguay”, INIA Las Brujas. Disponible en: http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3740/1/SIS41031163325667.pdf. Consultado el 21 de abril de 2019.

HOARE, C. (1981): “The 1980 ACM Turing Award Lecture: The Emperor Old Clothes”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, n° 2, pp. 75-83.

KAMP, L. (2010): “The Development of Wind Power in the Netherlands and Denmark”, en P. Strachan, D. Toke y D. Lal (eds.): Wind Power and Power Politics. International Perspectives, Nueva York, Palgrave, pp. 183-202.

LUNDVALL, B. Å. (1985): “Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction”, Industrial Development Research Series, n° 31, Aalborg University Press.

MISA, T. (1994): “Retrieving Sociotechnical Change from Technological Determinism”, en M. R. Smith y L. Marx (eds.): Does Technology Drive History? The dilema of technological determinism, Nueva York, The MIT Press, pp. 115-142.

MISA, T. (2011): Leonardo to the Internet. Technology and Culture From The Renaissance To The Present, Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.

NOBLE. D. (1979): “Social choice in machine design: the case of numerically controlled machine tools”, in A. Zimbalist (ed.): Case Studies on the labour process, Nueva York, Monthly Review Press, pp. 18-50.

METROPOLIS, N., HOWLETT, J. y ROTA, G. C. (1985): A History of Computing in the Twentieth Century, Nueva York, Academic Press.

OBRAS SANITARIAS DEL ESTADO (s/f): “UPA: planta compacta y transportable para la potabilización de agua”. Disponible en: http://www.ose.com.uy/descargas/publicaciones/Brochure_upas/upa.pdf. Consultado el 21 de abril de 2019.

OSTROM, E. (1996): “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development”, World Development, vol. 24, n° 6, pp. 1073-1087.

PIKETTY, T. (2014): Capital in the XXI Century, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

RHODES, R. (2005): Dark Sun. The making of the hydrogen bomb, Nueva York, Simon & Schuster.

ROGERS, E. M. (2003): Diffusion of Innovations, Nueva York, Free Press.

SCHOT, J. (2003): “The Contested Rise of a Modernist Technology Politics”, en T. Misa, P. Brey y A. Feenberg (eds.): Modernity and Technology, Cambridge, The MIT Press, pp. 257-278.

SCHOT, J. y RIP, A. (1997): “The past and future of constructive technology assessment”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 54, n° 2–3, pp. 251-268.

SCHUMACHER, E. (1984): Lo pequeño es hermoso, Madrid, Hermann Blume.

SEN, A. (2000): “Social Exclusion: Concept, Application and Scrutiny”, Social Development Papers, n° 1, Asian Development Bank.

TIKU, N. (2018): “The year tech workers realized they were workers”, WIRED. Disponible en: https://www.wired.com/story/why-hotel-workers-strike-reverberated-through-tech/. Consultado el 10 de enero de 2019.

VON HIPPEL, E. (1998): The Sources of Innovation, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.

WEIZENBAUM, J. (1976): Computer Power and Human Reason. From Judgement to Calculation, San Francisco, Freeman and Co.

ZUBOFF, S. (2019): The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Nueva York, Public Affairs.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-06-27

Como Citar

Sutz, J. (2019). Engenharia e preocupação social: rumo a novas práticas. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS, 14(41). Recuperado de https://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/113

Edição

Seção

Dossiê