Cooperação ciência-indústria: pode também aprender a parte pública?
Palavras-chave:
inovação, aprendizagem, conhecimento, cooperação, biofarmacêuticoResumo
Este trabalho discute a ideia geralmente aceita de que a cooperação público-privada gera apenas transferências unilaterais de conhecimento a partir das instituições públicas de pesquisa e desenvolvimento para as empresas industriais, e sugere que existem formas colaborativas nas quais a geração do conhecimento é conjunta y que elas se caracterizam pela presença de fluxos bidirecionais de conhecimento. Através de um estudo de casos múltiplos, esse aspecto é pesquisado em três associações público-privadas do setor biofarmacêutico argentino, com foco nos fluxos de conhecimento e na identificação de possíveis processos de aprendizagem que a parte pública desenvolve ao cooperar com as empresas.Downloads
Referências
ABRAMOVSKY, L. y SIMPSON, H.D. (2011): “Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: evidence from Great Britain”, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 11, n° 6, pp. 949-977.
ANKRAH, S.N., BURGESS, T.F., GRIMSHAW, P. y SHAW, N.E. (2013): “Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer; what single-group studies of motives omit”, Technovation, vol. 33, n° 2-3, pp. 50-65.
AROCENA, R. y SUTZ, J. (2005): “Latin American Universities: From an original revolution to an uncertain transition”, Higher Education, vol. 50, n° 4, pp. 573-592.
ARZA, V. (2010): “Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America”, Science and Public Policy, vol. 37, n° 7, pp. 473–484.
ARZA, V., de FUENTES, C., DUTRÉNIT, G y VAZQUEZ, C. (2014): “Channels and Benefits of Interaction Between Public Research Organization and Industry: Comparing Country Cases in Africa, Asia and Latin America”, en G. Kruss, K. Lee, W. Suzigan y Alburqueque E. (eds.): Changing dominant patterns of interactions: lessons from an investigation on universities and firms in Africa, Asia and Latin America, Londres, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 239-284.
BERCOVITZ, J. y FELDMAN, M. (2007): “Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances”, Research Policy, vol. 36, n° 7, pp. 930-948.
BRUNEEL, J., D’ESTE, P. y SALTER, A. (2010): “Investigating The Factors That Diminish The Barriers To University-Industry Collaboration”, Research Policy, vol. 39, n° 7, pp. 858-868.
BUSH, V. (1945): Science the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research, Washington DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.
CEPAL-SEGIB (2010): Espacios iberoamericanos: vínculos entre universidades y empresas para el desarrollo tecnológico, Santiago de Chile, Naciones Unidas.
COHEN, W. M., NELSON, R. R. y WALSH, J.P. (2002): “Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”, Management Science, vol. 48, n° 1, pp. 1–23.
DASGUPTA, P. y DAVID, P. (1994): “Toward a new economics of science”, Research Policy, vol. 23, n° 5, pp. 487–521.
D'ESTE, P. y PATEL, P. (2007): “University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry?”, Research Policy, vol. 36, n° 9, pp. 1295-1313.
D'ESTE P. y PERKMANN M. (2011): “Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations”, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 36, n° 3, pp. 316-339.
EDQUIST C. (1997): “Systems of innovation approaches - their emergence and characteristics”, en Edquist, C. (ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Londres, Pinter/Cassell, pp. 1-35.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy, vol. 29, n° 2, pp. 109-123.
FREEMAN, C. (2004): “Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 13, n° 3, pp. 541-569.
FRITSCH, M. y SCHWIRTEN, C. (1999: “Enterprise–university cooperation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems”, Industry and Innovation, vol. 6, n° 1, pp. 69–83.
GULBRANDSEN, M. y SMEBY, J.C. (2005): “Industry funding and university professors’ research performance”, Research Policy, vol. 34, n° 6, pp. 932–950.
LAURSEN, K., y SALTER, A. (2006): “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, n° 2, pp. 131–150.
LEE, Y.S. (2000): “The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment”, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 25, n° 2, pp. 111–133.
LENGYEL, M. y BOTTINO, G. (2010): “La co-producción de la innovación y su diseño institucional: evidencia de la industria argentina”, Buenos Aires, FLACSO Argentina.
LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ, R.E., MEDELLIN, E., SCANLON, A.P. y SOLLEIRO, J.L. (1994): “Motivations and obstacles to university–industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case”, R&D Management, vol. 24, n° 1, pp. 17–31.
LUNDVALL, B. (1997): “National Systems and National Styles of Innovation”, 4th International ASEAT Conference - “Differences in styles of technological innovation,” Manchester.
MANSFIELD, E. (1995): “Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 77, n° 1, pp. 55–65.
MEYER-KRAHMER, F. y SCHMOCH, U. (1998): “Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields”, Research Policy, vol. 27, n° 8, pp. 835-851.
MILESI, D., VERRE, V. y PETELSKI, N. (2017): “Science-industry R&D cooperation effects on firm’s appropriation strategy: the case of Argentine biopharma”, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 20, n° 3, pp. 372-391.
NELSON, R. (1993): National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
NIEMINEN, M. y KAUKONEN, E. (2001): “Universities and R&D networking in a knowledge-based economy. A glance at Finnish developments”, Sitra Reports, serie 11, Helsinki, Sitra.
OWEN-SMITH, J. y POWELL, W. W. (2001): “Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences”, en S. Vallas (ed.): Transformation of Work. Research into the Sociology of Work, vol. 10, Greenwich, JAI Press, pp. 109–140.
PERKMANN, M. y WALSH, K. (2007): “University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9, n° 4, pp. 259-280.
PERKMANN M. y WALSH K. (2008): “Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry”, Research Policy, vol. 37, n° 10, pp. 1884-1891.
PERKMANN, M. y WALSH, K. (2009): “The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18, n° 6, pp.1033-1065.
RIVERA RIOS, M., ROBERT, V. y YOGUEL, G. (2009): “Cambio tecnológico, complejidad e instituciones: Una aproximación desde la estructura industrial e institucional de Argentina y México”, Problemas del Desarrollo, vol. 40, n° 57, pp. 75-109.
SCHARTINGER, D., RAMMER, C., FISCHER, M.M. y FROHLICH, J. (2002): “Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants”, Research Policy, vol. 31, n° 3, pp. 303-328.
STAKE, R. (1995): Investigación con estudios de caso, Madrid, Ediciones Morata.
VERRE, V., MILESI, D. y PETELSKI, N. (2017): “Estrategias de apropiación en contextos de colaboración público-privada en la biotecnología argentina”, Economía: Teoría y Práctica, vol. 47, n° 2, pp. 31-64.
VESSURI, H. (ed.) (1998): La Investigación y Desarrollo en las Universidades de América Latina, Caracas, Fondo Editorial FINTEC.
YIN, R. (1984): Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Todas os números de CTS e seus artigos individuais estão sob uma licença CC-BY.
Desde 2007, a CTS proporciona acesso livre, aberto e gratuito a todos seus conteúdos, incluídos o arquivo completo da edição quadrimestral e os diversos produtos apresentados na plataforma eletrônica. Esta decisão é baseada no entendimento de que fornecer acesso livre aos materiais publicados ajuda a ter uma maior e melhor troca de conhecimentos.
Por sua vez, em se tratando da edição quadrimestral, a revista permite aos repositórios institucionais e temáticos, bem como aos sites pessoais, o autoarquivo dos artigos na versão post-print ou versão editorial, logo após da publicação da versão definitiva de cada número e sob a condição de incorporar ao autoarquivo um link direcionado à fonte original.
