Promover a transdisciplinaridade para a cocriação do conhecimento
O caso do ReD-IT (Universidade de Talca, Chile)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-386Palavras-chave:
Sistema Chileno de Ensino Superior, perspetiva multinível, ReD-IT, inovação transformativa, Universidade de TalcaResumo
Dado o grau de complexidade dos problemas que a sociedade enfrenta, as universidades são chamadas a desempenhar um papel preponderante como instituições que geram e divulgam o conhecimento. Este papel deve ser acompanhado de abordagens epistemológicas, interdisciplinares e transdisciplinares, que promovem o inclusivo e o co-criado com as partes interessadas dos territórios, permitindo avançar para sistemas sociotécnicos sustentável. Daí a necessidade de criar espaços protegidos para a experimentação alinhados com os desafios sociais e ambientais, que facilitam a geração de aprendizagem e reflexividade entre os seus membros. A experiência da Rede Transdisciplinar de Inovação (ReD-IT) da Universidade de Talca é apresentado como um nicho alternativo contra o regime universitário dominante. Procura transformar não só o modelo institucional de R+D+i, mas também estimular um processo de direcionalidade e experimentação, o que encoraja a capacidade de identificar e proteger novas opções radicais, seguindo as orientações da Inovação Transformadora. Através da utilização da perspetiva multinível é possível estabelecer dinâmicas sistémicas entre os três níveis (panorama, regime e nicho). Da mesma forma, o caráter experimental do foi avaliado, através dos critérios de reconhecimento de políticas com potencial transformador, evidenciando diferenças importantes entre as práticas desenvolvidas no âmbito da ReD-TI e as que são habituais ao regime.
Downloads
Referências
Arbo, P. & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: a literature review. OECD Education Working Paper, 9. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/161208155312
Arocena, R. & Sutz, J. (2021). El ideal latinoamericano de universidad y la realidad del siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Universidades 13. México: Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe.
Arocena, R. & Sutz, J. (2015). La Universidad en las políticas de conocimiento para el desarrollo inclusivo. Cuestiones de Sociología, (12), 1-18. Disponible en: http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.6758/pr.6758.pdf.
Binder, C., Absenger-Helmli, I. & Schilling, T. (2015) The reality of transdisciplinarity: A framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders. Sustain. Sci., 10, 545–562. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-015-0328-2.
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, , C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J. & von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008.
Compagnucci, L. & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284.
Deleye, M., Van Poeck, K. & Block, T. (2019). Lock-ins and opportunities for sustainability transition: a multi-level analysis of the Flemish higher education system. International Journal of Sustainability in High Education, 20(7), 1109–1124. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-09-2018-0160.
Drucker, J. & Goldstein, H., (2007). Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20-46. DOI: 10.1177/0160017606296731.
Ferrer-Balas, D., Buckland, H. & Mingo, M. (2009). Explorations on the University's role in society for sustainable development through a systems transition approach. Case study of the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC). Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1075-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.006.
Filho, W. L. (2000). Sustainabilty and university life. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(2), 168-181. DOI: 10.1108/ijshe.2000.24901aae.005.
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
Geels, F. W. (2018). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability in Asquith et al, Perspectives on transitions to sustainability. EEA Report, 25/2017, 45-69. DOI: 10.2800/332443.
Geels, F.W. & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 441–455. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.009
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257-1274. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Ghosh, B. & Schot, J. (2019). Towards a novel regime change framework: Studying mobility transitions in public transport regimes in an Indian megacity. Energy Research and Social Science, 51, 82–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.001.
Gibbons, M. (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761, C81–C84. DOI: 10.1038/35011576.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Geels, F. W., Loorbach, D. & Schot, J.W. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change. Nueva York: Routledge.
Hidalgo, C., López, M. B. & Smulski, M. (2018). Inquietud y contingencia: tres casos de “enredos experimentales” en la investigación ID/TD. ClimaCom, 5(13). Recuperado de: http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/A9.pdf.
Hume, M. T. (2015). Higher Education and the Transition to a Sustainable Future. School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy. Belfast: Queen's University Belfast.
Kemp, R., Schot, J. & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. DOI: 10.1080/09537329808524310.
König, A. (2015). Changing requisites to universities in the 21st century: organizing for transformative sustainability science for systemic change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Sustainability Science, 16, 105–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.011.
Lang, D. L., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges”, Sustainability Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
Larsson, J. & Holmberg, J., (2018). Learning while creating value for sustainability transitions: The case of Challenge Lab at Chalmers University of Technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4411–4420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.072.
Loorbach, D, (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.
M’Gonigle, M. & Starke, J. (2006). Planet U: Sustaining the World, Reinventing the University. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Ministerio de Educación (2018). Ley 21.094 sobre Universidades Estatales. Santiago de Chile. Recuperado de: https://bcn.cl/2f6x8.
Paredis, E. (2013), A Winding Road: Transition Management, Policy Change and the Search for SD. Ghent: Ghent University.
Pohl, C., Rist, S., Zimmermann, A. Fry, P., Gurung, G.S., Schneider, F., Speranza, C.I., Kiteme, B., Boillat, S., Serrano, E., Hirsch, G. & Wiesmann U. (2010). Researchers’ roles in knowledge coproduction: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Pol, 37(4), 267-281.
Radinger-Peer, V., Pflitsch, G., Kanning, H. & Schiller, D. (2021). Establishing the Regional Sustainable Developmental Role of Universities—From the Multilevel-Perspective (MLP) and Beyond. Sustainability, 13, 6987. DOI: 10.3390/su13136987.
Ramírez, M. & Pinzón, L. (2018). Orientaciones para la formulación de políticas regionales de innovación transformativa en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad de Sussex & SPRU-COLCIENCIAS.
Raven, R., van den Bosch, S. & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. Int. J. Technology Management, 51(1), 57–74. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033128.
Rip, A. & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human choice and climate change, 2(2), 327-399.
Scholz, R. W. & Steiner, G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: Part I—Theoretical foundations. Sustain. Sci., 10, 527–544. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4.
Scholz, R. W., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Walter, A. I. & Stauffacher, M., (2006). Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning, historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 226-251.
Scholz, R. W. (2020). Transdisciplinarity: science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustainability Science, 15, 1033–1049. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00794-x.
Schot, J. Boni, A., Ramírez, M. & Alvial-Palavicino, C. (2021). Transformative innovation Policy & Social Innovation. TIPC Research Briefing 2020-21. Recuperado de: https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/.
Schot, J., Daniels, C., Torrens, J. & Bloomfield, G. (2017). Developing a Shared Understanding of Transformative Innovation Policy. TIPC Research Brief 2017-01. Recuperado de: http://www.transformative-innovation-policy.net.
Schot, J. W. & Geels, F.W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 537–554. DOI: 10.1080/09537320802292651.
Shove, E. & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and planning A, 39(4), 763-770. DOI: 10.1068/a39310.
Soini, K., Jurgilevich, A., Pietikäinen, J. & Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2018). Universities responding to the call for sustainability: A typology of sustainability centres. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1423–1432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.228.
Stauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P. & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region. Syst Pract Action Res, 21, 409–422. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7.
Stephens, J., Hernandez, M., Román, M., Graham, A. & Scholz, R. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9. DOI: 10.1108/14676370810885916.
Talwar, S., Wiek., A. & Robinson, J. (2011). User engagement in sustainability research. Science and Public Policy, 38(59), 389–390. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234211X12960315267615.
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H. & Kraines, S. B. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41, 151-179. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct044.
Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B. & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010.
Velasco, D. & Bernales, P. (2021). Política de Innovación Transformadora. Texto Base Diploma de Especialización en Innovación para la transformación social y ambiental. Valencia: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
Velasco, D., Boni, S. & Chalela, S. (2021). Developing Transformative Innovation Through Policy Experimentation in Two Colombian Universities. En L. A. Orozco, G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, J. H. Sierra-González, J. García-Estévez & J. Bortagaray (Eds.), Science, Technology, and Higher Education Governance Approaches on Social Inclusion and Sustainability in Latin America. Palgrave & Mcmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80720-7
Velasco, D., Boni, A., Delgado, C. & Rojas-Forero, G. D. (2021). Exploring the role of a Colombian university to promote just transitions. An analysis from the human development and the regional transition pathways to sustainability. Sustainability, 13(11), 6014.
Vienni, B. & Rojas-Castro, S. (2019). Transdisciplinary institutionalization in higher education: a two-level analysis. Studies in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1593347.
Vienni, B. & Goñi, M. (2021). Aportes para los estudios sobre interdisciplina y transdisciplina: modalidades, estrategias y factores para la integración. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, (26)94, 110-127. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27968018005.
Wanner, M., Bernert, P., Fischer, N. & Schmitt, M. (2021) Creating Learning and Teaching Spaces for Transformative and Transdisciplinary Research: the Transformative Innovation Lab. DIDAC, 49-59. DOI: 10.48102/didac.2021.78_JUL-DIC.83.
Whitmer, A., Ogden, L., Lawton, J., Sturner, P., Groffman, P. M., Schneider, L., Hart, D., Halpern, B., Schlesinger, W., Raciti, S., Bettez, N., Ortega, S., Rustad, L., Pickett, S. T. & Killilea, M. (2010). The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 314–321. DOI: 10.1890/090241.
Wittmayer, J. & Schäpke, N. (2014). Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transition. Sustain Sci, 9, 483–496. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4.
WBGU (2011). Welt im Wandel Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Grobe Transformation. Berlín: WGBU.
Zurbringen, C. & Sierra, M. (2021). Transición hacia un futuro sostenible. ¿qué aporta la investigación transdisciplinaria? Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26(94), 158-176. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4815680.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 CC Attribution 4.0
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todas os números de CTS e seus artigos individuais estão sob uma licença CC-BY.
Desde 2007, a CTS proporciona acesso livre, aberto e gratuito a todos seus conteúdos, incluídos o arquivo completo da edição quadrimestral e os diversos produtos apresentados na plataforma eletrônica. Esta decisão é baseada no entendimento de que fornecer acesso livre aos materiais publicados ajuda a ter uma maior e melhor troca de conhecimentos.
Por sua vez, em se tratando da edição quadrimestral, a revista permite aos repositórios institucionais e temáticos, bem como aos sites pessoais, o autoarquivo dos artigos na versão post-print ou versão editorial, logo após da publicação da versão definitiva de cada número e sob a condição de incorporar ao autoarquivo um link direcionado à fonte original.
