Co-criando valor público
Desafios a serem superados pela América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-498Palavras-chave:
inovação social, inovação pública, co-criação, co-projetoResumo
A crescente complexidade, diversidade e dinamismo que a solução de problemas públicos ganha nas sociedades contemporâneas levou a encontrar nos conceitos de inovação social, inovação pública, inovação aberta e co-criação muitas das categorias descritivas e explicativas de um novo paradigma emergente de uma governança colaborativa e experimental. Neste cenário, os processos que exploram e reconsideram as formas de engajar cidadãos e comunidades para desempenharem um papel ativo na co-criação de serviços e políticas públicas aumentam sistematicamente. Surgem, assim, múltiplas iniciativas inovadoras a nível global para solucionar problemas públicos, ao mesmo tempo em que os governos, em diferentes graus e de diferentes formas, inovam no projeto de serviços e políticas, incorporando formas colaborativas e criativas e integrando abordagens de projeto (design thinking, projeto participativo) como ferramenta para promover a mudança. Simultaneamente, a web 2.0, as redes sociais e as diferentes formas de governo aberto contribuem com estes processos colaborativos. Este artigo explora os elementos diferenciais destas novas formas de co-criação, exemplificadas com diversas iniciativas globais e regionais, e levanta uma série de questões sobre os desafios e dilemas abertos para a América Latina.
Downloads
Referências
AHN, T. H. y OSTROM, E. (2003): Foundations of Social Capital. Edward Elgar.
ALFORD, J. (2009): Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service Delivery to Co- production, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
ALFORD, J. (2002): “Why Do Public Sector Clients Coproduce? Towards a Contingency Theory”, Administration and Society, vol. 34, n° 1, pp. 32–56.
ARNKIL, R., JÄRVENSIVU, A., KOSKI, P., y PIIRAINEN, T. (2010): “Exploring the Quadruple Helix”, Report of Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ Project, Work Research Centre, Universidad de Tampere.
ANSELL, C. y TORFING, J. (2014): Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design, Routledge critical studies in public management.
BASON, C. (2010): Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society, Bristol, Policy Press.
BASON, C. (2013): “Design-Led Innovation in Government”, Social Innovation Review, Springer. Disponible en: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/design_led_ innovation_in_government.
BEKKERS, V.J.J.M.; TUMMERS, L.G.; STUIJFZAND, B.G. y VOORBERG, W. (2013): “Social Innovation in the Public Sector: An integrative framework”, LIPSE Working papers, n°1, Rotterdam, Erasmus University.
BEKKERS, V., EDELENBOS, J. y STEIJN, B. (2011): “An innovative public sector? embarking on the innovation journey”, en V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos y B. Steijn (ed.): Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership, Houndsmills: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 197-222.
BOTERO, A., GRY PATERSON, A. y SAAD-SULONEN, J. (2012): Towards peer production in public services: cases from Finland, Helsinki, Aalto University publication series.
BOVAIRD, T. y LÖFLLER, E. (2013): We’re all in this together: harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes, Birmingham, Institute of Local Government Studies University of Birmingham.
BOVAIRD, T. y LÖFLLER, E. (2007): “Assessing the quality of local governance: a case study of public services”, Public Money and Management, vol. 27, nº 4, pp. 293- 300.
BOVAIRD, T. (2007): “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services”, Public Administration Review, vol. 67, n° 5, pp. 846–860.
BOYLE, D., SLAY, J. y STEPHENS, L. (2010): Public Services Inside Out: Putting co- production into practice, Londres, The Lab, NESTA.
BOYLE, D. y HARRIS M. (2009): The Challenge of Co-Production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services, Londres, The Lab, NESTA.
BRANDSEN, T. y PESTOFF, V. (2006): “Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services”, Public Management Review, vol. 8, nº 4, pp. 493-501.
CAULLIER-GRICE, J., DAVIES, A., PATRICK, R. y NORMAN, W. (2012): Defining Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empicirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), Bruselas, European Commission, DG Research.
CARAYANNIS, E.G. y CAMPBELL, D. F. J. (2010): “Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology”, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 41–69.
CHESBORUGH, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard, Harvard Business School Press.
CHESBORUGH, H. (2006): “Open Innovation; A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation”, en W. Chesbrough, H. Vanhaverbeke, y J. West (eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DIMAGGIO, P. y POWELL, W. (1991): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press.
ENOLL (2012): European Network of Living Labs -EnoLL. Disponible en: http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/.
HIRSCHMAN, A. O. (2000): “La mirada de Hirschman sobre el desarrollo o el arte de los traspasos y las autosubversiones”, Revista de la CEPAL, nº 70.
HOCHGERNER, J. (2011): The analysis of Social Innovation as Social Practice. Zentrum Für Soziale Innovation, Viena, ZSI.
HOWALDT, J. y SCHWARZ, M. (2010): Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends, IMO international monitoring.
HUBERT, A. (2011): Empowering people, driving change. Social Innovation in the European Union, Francia, Bureau of European Policy Adivsers (BEPA), European Commission.
INFORME FINAL (2012): Modelo de gestión de la innovación para el sector público chileno e implementación del piloto a la municipalidad de Conchalí. Definición, diseño e implementación del modelo LTC Project & Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez. Santiago de Chile. Disponible en: http://repositoriodigital.corfo.cl/bitstream/handle/11373/8210/IF %20Gestion%20de%20la%20Innovacion%20para%20el%20Sector%20Publico.pdf? sequence=1.
INNERARITY, D. (2009): “La sociedad de la innovación. Notas para una teoría de la innovación social”, en D. Innerarity y A. Gurrutxaga (2009): ¿Cómo es una sociedad innovadora?, Innobasque, Agencia Vasca de Innovación. Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia.
KONIG, A. (2013): Regenerative Sustainable Development of Universities and Cities: The Role of Living Laboratories. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
LECHNER, N. (1999): “Estado, y sociedad en perspectiva democrática”, Estado, democracia y ciudadanía. Papeles de Investigación, Página 12.
LIPSKY, (1980): Street level bureaucracy: the dilemma of the individual in public services, Nueva York, Russell Sage Foundation.
LÖFLLER, E. (2009): Improving the Quality of Public Services: Putting the Citizens at the Centre of Administrative Action, SIGMA.
MANZINI, E. y STASZOWSKI, E. (2013): Public and Collaborative. Exploring the intersection of design, social innovation and public policy, USA, Desis Network. Disponible en: http://www.mind-lab.dk/assets/1016/DESIS_PandC_Book.pdf.
MEIJER, A. J. (2011): “Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support”, Public Administration Review, vol. 71, n° 4, pp: 598-607.
MULGAN, G., TUCKER, S., ALI, R. y SANDERS, B. (2007): Social Innovation: What is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated, Oxford, Said Business School.
MURRAY, R., MULGAN, G. y CAULLIER-GRICE, J. (2008): How to Innovate: The tools for social innovation, Londres, The Young Foundation, NESTA.
NODO ANTIOQUÍA DE INNOVACIÓN SOCIAL (2014): Innovación social en Antioquia 2013. Disponible en: http://es.scribd.com/doc/228013177/Publicacion-innovacio-n- social-en-antioquia-2013.
NONAKA, I. (1994): “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, vol. 5, nº 1, February, p. 14.
ONU-HABITAT (2013): Transfiriendo Mejores Prácticas. Disponible en: http://www.onuhabitat.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=997
&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=71.
OSBORNE, S. y BROWN, L. (2013): “Risk and innovation: Towards a framework for risk governanceinpublic services”, Public Management Review, vol. 15, n° 2, pp. 186- 208.
OSTROM, E. (1996): “Coproduction, Synergy, and Development World Development”, World Development, vol. 24, n° 6, pp. 1073-1087.
PATERSON, A. G. (2010): “A buzz between rural cooperation and the online swarm”,
Journal of Radical Theory, Culture and Action, vol. 4, n° 1. Disponible en: http://dev.affinitiesjournal.org/index.php/affinities/article/view/51.
PESTOFF, V.; BRANDSEN, T. Y VERSCHUERE, B. (2012): New public governance, the third sector and co-production, Londres, Routledge.
PESTOFF, V. (2012): “Co-production and third sector social services in Europe - Some crucial conceptual issues”, en V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen y B. Verschuere (eds.): New public governance, the third sector and co-production, cap 2, Londres, Routledge.
PESTOFF, V. (2009): “Towards a Paradigm of Democratic Participation: Citizen Participation and Co-production of Personal Social Services in Sweden”, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol. 80, n° 2, pp. 197–224.
PHILLS J., A., DEIGLMEIER, K. y MILLER, D. T. (2008): “Rediscovering Social Innovation”, Stanford Social Innovation Review. Disponible en: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation.
POLLITT, C. y HUPE, P. (2011): “Talking About Government: The Role of Magic Concepts ”, Public Management Review, vol. 13, n° 5, pp: 641-58.
PUTNAM, R. D. (1995): “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, pp. 65-78.
RODRÍGUEZ, A. y ALVARADO UGARTE, H. (2008): Claves de la Innovación Social en América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile, CEPAL.
STASZOWSKI, E., BROWN, S. y WINTER, B. (2013): “Reflections on Designing for Social Innovation in the Public Sector: A Case Study in New York City”, en: Manzini, E. y Staszowski, E. (eds.): Public and Collaborative. Exploring the intersection of design, social innovation and public policy, USA, Desis Network. Disponible en: http://www.mind-lab.dk/assets/1016/DESIS_PandC_Book.pdf.
SCHIAVO, E. y SERRA, A. (2013): “Laboratorios ciudadanos e innovación abierta en los sistemas CTS del siglo XXI. Una mirada desde Iberoamérica”, Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad - CTS, vol. 8, n° 23, pp. 115-121.
SIG y MARS SOLUTIONS LAB (2012): Labs designing the future. Disponible en: http://www.marsdd.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/MaRSReport-Labs-designing- the-future_2012.pdf.
SERRA, A. (2010): “Citilabs: ¿qué pueden ser los laboratorios ciudadanos?”, Revista La Factoría, nº 45-46. Disponible en: www.revistalafactoria.eu/articulo.php?id=523.
SOCIAL INNOVATION EXCHANGE y THE YOUNG FOUNDATION (2010): Study on Social Innovation. A paper prepared by the Social Innovation eXchange and the Young Foundation for the Bureau of Eurpean Policy Advisors. Disponible en: http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Study-on-Social-Innovation- for-the-Bureau-of-European-Policy-Advisors-March-2010.pdf.
SORENSEN, E. y TORFING, J. (2011): “Enhancing collab-orative innovation in the public sector’, Administration and Society, vol. 43, n° 8, pp. 842-868.
STEWART, J. (2009): The Dilemmas of Engagement: The role of consultation in governance, Australia, ANU E Press.
STOKER, G. (2007): Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Hampshire, Palgrave, Macmillan.
THINKPUBLIC (2012): Community coaches. Disponible en: http://thinkpublic.com/ case-studies/community-coaches/.
TRENCHER, G., YARIME, M., McCORMICK, K. B., DOLL, C. y KRAINES, S. B. (2013): “Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co- creation for sustainability”, Science and Public Policy, vol. 41, n° 2, pp. 151-179.
VERGANTI, R. (2009): Design Driven Innovation – Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating what Things Mean, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
SANDERS, E. y STAPPERS, P.J. (2008): “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design”, CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, vol. 4, n° 1, pp. 5-18.
VERSCHUERE, B.; BRANDSEN, T., y PESTOFF, V. (2012): “Co-production: The state of the art in researchand the future agenda”, Voluntas, vol. 23, n° 4, pp. 1083-1101.
VON HIPPEL, E., (2005): Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
VOORBERG, W., BEKKERS, V. y TUMMERS, L. (2013): “Co-creation and Co- production in Social Innovation: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda”, EGPA, Edimburgo, 11-13 de septiembre de 2013.
VOORBERG, W., BEKKERS, V. y TUMMERS, L. (2014): Co-creation in social innovation: A comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co- creation, Ottowa, IRSPM.
WHITAKER, G. (1980): “Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery”, Public Administration Review, vol. 40, n° 3, pp. 240–24.
Mindlab: http://www.mind-lab.dk/en/methods
Helsinki Design Lab: www.helsinkidesignlab.org/instudio/
Social Innovation Lab Kent Silk: http://socialinnovation.typepad.com/silk/silk-method- deck.html
NESTA: http://www.nesta.org.uk/
Design Council UK: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/
Innovate San Francisco: http://innovatesf.com
Public Innovation Sacramento: http://publicinnovation.org/
Public Policy Lab: http://publicpolicylab.org/
Design Gov Australia: http://innovation.govspace.gov.au
Better Public Services New Zealand: http://www.ssc.govt.nz/better-plic-servicesub
Co-Innovation Partnership Singapore: http://www.coinnovation.gov.sg/
South African Center for Public Service Innovation: http://www.cpsi.co.za/
LiveWork: http://liveworkstudio.com/
Thinkpublic: http://thinkpublic.com/
La 27e Région: http://blog.la27eregion.fr/
Snook: http://wearesnook.com/snook/
Citilab: http://citilab.eu/es
Engine: http://enginegroup.co.uk/work/kcc-social-innovation-lab
Participle: http://www.participle.net/projects/view/5/101/
TACSI: http://www.tacsi.org.au/services/innovation-reading-list/
Think Place: http://www.thinkplace.com.au/
Kennisland: http://www.kennisland.nl/
Social Innovation Exchange: http://www.socialinnovationexchange.org
Stanford Center for Social Innovation: http://csi.gsb.stanford.edu/
Harvard Innovation Lab: http://i-lab.harvard.edu/
Brown University Swearer Center for Public Service: http://brown.edu/academics/ college/special-programs/public-service/
The Community Innovators Lab – MIT: http://web.mit.edu/colab/about.html7
The Governance Lab - NYU: http://thegovlab.org/
Parsons Desis Lab: http://www.newschool.edu/desis/
Center for Development Innovation – Wageningen University: http://www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Research-Institutes/centre-for- development-innovation.htm
The Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience: http://www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Research-Institutes/centre-for- development-innovation.htm
Social Innovation Generation (SIG): http://www.sigeneration.ca/
RedEsis: http://www.desis-clusters.org/
Ciudadanía 2.0 SEGIB: http://segib.org/es/node/80
Centro de Innovación Social – Colombia: http://www.anspe.gov.co/es/programa/ centro-de-innovacion-social
Nodo de Innovación Social – Colombia: http://www.politicadeinnovacionsocial.co/ gestion-colectiva-de-ideas
Adapt Chile: http://www.adapt-chile.org/
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 CC Attribution 4.0
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todas os números de CTS e seus artigos individuais estão sob uma licença CC-BY.
Desde 2007, a CTS proporciona acesso livre, aberto e gratuito a todos seus conteúdos, incluídos o arquivo completo da edição quadrimestral e os diversos produtos apresentados na plataforma eletrônica. Esta decisão é baseada no entendimento de que fornecer acesso livre aos materiais publicados ajuda a ter uma maior e melhor troca de conhecimentos.
Por sua vez, em se tratando da edição quadrimestral, a revista permite aos repositórios institucionais e temáticos, bem como aos sites pessoais, o autoarquivo dos artigos na versão post-print ou versão editorial, logo após da publicação da versão definitiva de cada número e sob a condição de incorporar ao autoarquivo um link direcionado à fonte original.
