Presentation
Abstract
"Biotechnology is not entirely easy to define, because it is used in very different ways by different people in different contexts," admits Moses (2004: 237) when introducing the science policy dossier in a recent issue of Current Opinion in Biotechnology. He then offers a categorization that is striking for its level of generality: "at one extreme, it can be seen almost as a science—a compendium of genetics, molecular biology, and related topics that are somehow subsumed in a vaguely defined practical context. At the other, it is modern biology expressed in commercial terms of products and services."
Downloads
References
BUD, Robert (1991): “Biotechnology in the twentieth century”, Social Studies of Sciences, volume 21, issue 3 (Aug.), pp. 415-457.
DIETRICH Heather; SCHIBECI, Renato (2003): “Beyond public perceptions of gene technology: community participation in public policy in Australia”, Public Understanding of Science 12, pp. 381-401.
MOSES, Vivian (2004): “Biotechnology and science policy”, editorial overview, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 15, pp. 237-240.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CC Attribution 4.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.
Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.
In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.