Plan S en América Latina: una nota de precaución

Authors

  • Humberto Debat Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (IPAVE-CIAP-INTA)
  • Dominique Babini Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)

Abstract

El Plan S es una iniciativa de un consorcio europeo de financiadores de investigación orientada a exigir la publicación en acceso abierto de los resultados de la investigación financiados por fondos públicos o privados. Está previsto que se internacionalice en 2021. Lanzado en septiembre de 2018 y revisado en mayo de 2019, el plan, que cuenta con el apoyo de la llamada cOAlition S (2019a), involucra diez principios dirigidos a dictar publicaciones académicas en “revistas de acceso abierto, plataformas de acceso abierto, o puestas a disposición de inmediato a través de repositorios de acceso abierto (sin período de embargo)”. cOAlition S (2019b), está coordinado por Science Europe, cuenta con 17 financiadores de investigación nacionales, cinco fundaciones benéficas y el Consejo Europeo de Investigación, y está buscando el apoyo de otras regiones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLEA (2018): “Systemic reforms and further consultation needed to make Plan S a success”. Disponible en: https://www.allea.org/systemic-reforms-and-further-consultation-needed-to-make-plan-s-a-success/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ALPERIN, J. P. (2015): “The public impact of Latin America's approach to open access”, disertación doctoral, Stanford University. Disponible en: https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:jr256tk1194/AlperinDissertationFinalPublicImpact-augmented.pdf. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ALPERIN, J. P. (2016): “Research is also for non-scholars: Lessons from Latin America”, conferencia. Disponible en: https://figshare.com/articles/Research_is_also_for_non_scholars_Lessons_from_Latin_America/3187551. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ALPERIN, J. P., BABINI, D., CHAN, L., GRAY, E., GUEDON, J-C., JOSEPH, H., RODRIGUES, E., SHEARER, K. y VESSURI, E. (2015): “Open Access in Latin America: A paragon for the rest of the world”, SPARC. Disponible en: https://sparcopen.org/news/2015/open-access-in-latin-america-a-paragon-for-the-rest-of-the-world/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

AMELICA (2019a): “Ameli, conocimiento abierto para América Latina y el Sur Global”. Disponible en: http://www.amelica.org/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

AMELICA (2019b): “Qué es Ameli, conocimiento abierto para América Latina y el Sur Global. Disponible en: http://www.amelica.org/index.php/que-es-ameli/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ARGENTINA (s/f): Sistema nacional de repositorios digitales. Disponible en: http://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ARGENTINA (2013): Ley 26.899: Creación de Repositorios Digitales Institucionales de Acceso Abierto, Propios o Compartidos. Disponible en: http://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/vufind/Content/bibliografia. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ARGENTINA y UNIÓN EUROPEA (2019): “Joint communiqué. XI joint steering committee meeting of the bilateral agreement on science and technology between the European Union and Argentina”. Disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/pdf/policy/ec_rtd_jc-11th-jscm-eu-ar_062019.pdf. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

BABINI, D. (2019): “La comunicación científica en América Latina es abierta, colaborativa y no comercial: desafíos para las revistas”, Palabra Clave, vol. 8, n° 2, e065, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e065.

BABINI, D. y MACHIN-MASTROMATTEO, J. D. (2015): “Latin American science is meant to be open access: Initiatives and current challenges”, Information Development, vol. 31, n° 5, pp. 477–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915601420.

BAUM, B. y COEN, E. (2019): “Evolution or revolution? Changing the way science is published and communicated”, PLoS biology, vol. 17, n° 6, e3000272, pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000272.

BECERRIL-GARCÍA, A. (2019): “AmeliCA vs Plan S: mismo objetivo, dos estrategias distintas para lograr el acceso abierto”. Disponible en: http://www.amelica.org/index.php/2019/01/10/amelica-vs-plan-s-mismo-objetivo-dos-estrategias-distintas-para-lograr-el-acceso-abierto/ . Consultado el 10/06/2019.

BECERRIL-GARCÍA, A. y AGUADO-LÓPEZ, E. (2018): “The end of a centralized open access project and the beginning of a community-based sustainable infrastructure for Latin America: Redalyc.org after fifteen years the open access ecosystem in Latin America”, ELPUB 2018, pp. 1–13. Disponible en: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01816693/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

BRAINARD, J. (2019): “Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S”, Science, vol. 363, n° 6425, pp. 332–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.363.6425.332.

CARIGNANO, H. y JAWORSKI, J. P. (2019): “Argentina’s subpar investment in science”, Science, vol. 363, n° 6428, p. 702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw3872.

CLACSO (2015): “Declaración de la Asamblea General de CLACSO sobre el acceso abierto al conocimiento gestionado como un bien común”. Disponible en: https://www.clacso.org.ar/conferencia2015/documentos/asamblea/declaraciones/4-Declaracion-de-CLACSO-sobre%20el-acceso-abierto-al-conocimiento-gestionado-como-un-bien-comun.pdf. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

CLARKE, M. (2018): “Plan S: Impact on society publishers”, Scholarly Kitchen. Disponible en: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/12/05/plan-s-impact-on-society-publishers/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

COALITION S. (2019a): “Plan S: Principles and implementation”. Disponible en: https://www.coalition-s.org/principles-and-implementation/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

COALITION S. (2019b): “Plan S: Funders”. Disponible en: https://www.coalition-s.org/funders/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

COALITION S. (2019c): “Feedback on the draft implementation guidance of Plan S [Data set]”, Zenodo. Disponible en: https://zenodo.org/record/3250081/#.XQ0RWLxKiUm. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

COAR (2019): Confederation of open access repositories. Disponible en: https://www.coar-repositories.org/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

CONSORCIOS DE IBEROAMÉRICA Y EL CARIBE (2017): “Declaración: Primera Reunión de Consorcios de Iberoamérica y el Caribe”. Disponible en: http://reuniondeconsorcios.conricyt.mx/index.php/primera-reunion/declaraciones/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY (2010): “arXiv Business model White Paper”. Disponible en: https://arxiv.org/help/support/whitepaper. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

DE KNECHT, S. (2019): “The death of the learned societies?”, ScienceGuide. Disponible en: https://www.scienceguide.nl/2019/06/the-death-of-the-learned-societies/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

DEBAT, H. y BABINI, D. (2019a): “Plan S in Latin America: A precautionary note”, PeerJ Preprints, n° 7, e27834v2, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27834v2.

DEBAT, H. y BABINI, D. (2019b): “Plan S en América Latina: Una nota de precaución”, Zenodo, pp. 1–11. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3332621.

DOAJ (2020): “Directory of open access journals”. Disponible en: https://doaj.org/. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

DORA (s/f.): “San Francisco declaration on research assessment”. Disponible en: https://sfdora.org/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

FIGSHARE (2019): “Plan S and the Global South – links to comments on concerns”. Disponible en: https://figshare.com/articles/Plan_S_and_the_Global_South_-_links_to_comments_on_concerns/10078634. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

FRANTSVÅG, J. E. y STRØMME, T. E. (2019): “Few open access journals are compliant with Plan S”, Publications, vol. 7, n° 2, 26, pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020026.

GROSSMANN, A. Y BREMBS, B. (2019): “Assessing the size of the affordability problem in scholarly publishing”, PeerJ Preprints, n° 7, e27809v1, pp. 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27809v1.

GUÉDON, J-C. (2018): “The history of the open access and its meaning”, ISSN 2018 Conference. Disponible en: https://webcast.in2p3.fr/video/the-history-of-the-open-access-and-its-meaning. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

HOLMWOOD, J. (2018): “The expansion of open access is being driven by commercialisation, where private benefit is adopting the mantle of public value”, LSE Impact Blog, Londres, London School of Economics. Disponible en: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/10/02/the-expansion-of-open-access-is-being-driven-by-commercialisation-where-private-benefit-is-adopting-the-mantle-of-public-value/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

MUKUNTH, V. (2019): “India will skip Plan S, focus on national efforts in science publishing”, The Wire. Disponible en: https://thewire.in/the-sciences/plan-s-open-access-scientific-publishing-article-processing-charge-insa-k-vijayraghavan. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

KOWALTOWSKI, A. J. y OLIVEIRA, M. F. (2019): “Plan S: Unrealistic capped fee structure”, Science, vol. 363, n° 6426, p. 461. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw5815. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

LA REFERENCIA (s/f): “Quiénes somos”. Disponible en: http://www.lareferencia.info/es/institucional/quienes-somos. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

LA REFERENCIA (2019): “LA Referencia: Comunicación Académica y Acceso Abierto. Acciones para una Política Pública en América Latina”. Disponible en: http://www.lareferencia.info/es/recursos/ciencia-abierta-documentos-externos/92-la-referencia-comunicacion-academica. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

LARIVIÈRE, V., HAUSTEIN, S. y MONGEON, P. (2015): “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era”, PloS one, vol. 10, n° 6, e0127502, pp. 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.

MCNUTT, M. (2019): “Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, n° 7, pp. 2400–2403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900359116.

MUDDITT, A. (2019): “Plan S and the transformation of scholarly communication: Are we missing the woods?”, Scholarly Kitchen Disponible en: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/06/03/plan-s-and-the-transformation-of-scholarly-communication-are-we-missing-the-woods/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

MUKUNTH, V. (2019): “Six concerns over India joining the Plan S coalition for science journals”, The Wire. Disponible en: https://thewire.in/the-sciences/six-concerns-over-india-joining-the-plan-s-coalition-for-science-journals. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

OA2020 (2015): Open Access 2020. Disponible en: https://oa2020.org/. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

PLAN S (2019): “Reaction of researchers to Plan S: Too far, too risky?”. Disponible en: https://sites.google.com/view/plansopenletter/open-letter. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

POYNDER, R. (2019a): “Plan S and the Global South: What do countries in the Global South stand to gain from signing up to Europe’s open access strategy?” LSE Impact Blog, Londres, London School of Economics. Disponible en: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/03/06/plan-s-and-the-global-south-what-do-countries-in-the-global-south-stand-to-gain-from-signing-up-to-europes-open-access-strategy/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

POYNDER, R. (2019b): “The OA interviews: Arianna Becerril-García, Chair of AmeliCA”. Disponible en: https://poynder.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-oa-interviews-arianna-becerril.html . Consultado el 10/07/2019.

PULVERER, B. (2018): “Open access—or open science?”, The EMBO Journal, vol. 37, n° 24, e101215, pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/embj.2018101215.

PURTON, M., MICHELANGELI, F. y FÉSÜS, L. (2019): “Will Plan S put learned societies in jeopardy?”, FEBS letters, vol. 593, n° 4, pp. 383–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13333.

REDALYC (2019): Sitio web. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

ROMAN, V. (2018): “Argentina’s economic crisis could trigger scientific ‘collapse,’ researchers warn”, Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5602.

SÃO PAULO STATEMENT ON OPEN ACCESS (2019: “Joint Declaration”. Disponible en: https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/Sao-Paulo-Statement-OA-01052019.pdf. Consultado el 10/07/2019.

SARABIPOUR, S., DEBAT, H. J., EMMOTT, E., BURGESS, S. J., SCHWESSINGER, B. y HENSEL, Z. (2019): “On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective”, PLoS biology, vol. 17, n° 2, e3000151, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151.

SAYER, L. (2019): “Plan S and open access in Latin America: Interview with Dominique Babini”, International Science Council Blog. Disponible en: https://council.science/current/blog/plan-s-and-open-access-interview-with-dominique-babini. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

SEVER, R., EISEN, M. y INGLIS, J. (2019): “Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates”, PLoS biology, vol. 17, n° 6, e3000273, pp. 1–4. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000273.

SINHA, A. (2019): “Should India adopt Plan S to realise open access to public-funded scientific research? Access To Knowledge”, Stanford, Center for Internet and Society. Disponible en: https://cis-india.org/a2k/blogs/should-india-adopt-plan-s-to-realise-open-access-to-public-funded-scientific-research. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

SOCIETY PUBLISHERS’ COALITION (2019): “Plan S consultation response from the Society Publishers’ Coalition”. Disponible en: https://www.biologists.com/wp-content/uploads/SPC-Consultation-Response-8-Feb-2019.pdf. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

SPARC EUROPE (2019): “SPARC Europe analysis of the new revised Plan S policy”. Disponible en: https://sparceurope.org/briefing_revisedplans_june2019/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

STERN, B. M. y O’SHEA, E. K. (2019): “A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences”, PLoS biology, vol. 17, n° 2, e3000116, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000116.

TENNANT, J. (2018): “Why the term ‘Article Processing Charge’ (APC) is misleading”, Green Tea and Velociraptors Blog. Disponible en: http://fossilsandshit.com/the-term-article-processing-charge-is-misleading/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

TENNANT, J. (2019): “Plan S: Time to decide what we stand for”, LSE Impact Blog, Londres, London School of Economics. Disponible en: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/03/05/plan-s-time-to-decide-what-we-stand-for/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

UNESCO (2017): “Global open access portal, Latin America and the Caribbean: Argentina”. Disponible en: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/argentina/. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

UNESCO (2019): “Global alliance of open access scholarly communication platforms”. Disponible en: https://en.unesco.org/news/launch-global-alliance-open-access-scholarly-communication-platforms-democratize-knowledge. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

WESSEL, L. (2019a): “Austerity cuts threaten future of science in Argentina”, Science, vol. 364, n° 6439, p. 419. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.364.6439.419.

WESSEL, L. (2019b): “Thousands of scientists in Argentina strike to protest budget cuts”, Science Magazine. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8765.

WILLINSKY, J. (2018): “El acceso al conocimiento científico es un derecho humano”, El País, 25 de abril. Disponible en: https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/04/25/ciencia/1524672252_074648.html. Consultado el 17/11/2019.

ZHANG, X. (2019): “OA2020 Mainland China signatory libraries responded to Plan S guidance on implementation”. Disponible en: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2019-March/005095.html. Consultado el 10/06/2019.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-26

How to Cite

Debat, H., & Babini, D. (2020). Plan S en América Latina: una nota de precaución. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 15(44). Retrieved from https://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/167

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 44 (2020)

Section

Documents

License

All CTS's issues and academic articles are under a CC-BY license.

Since 2007, CTS has provided open and free access to all its contents, including the complete archive of its quarterly edition and the different products presented in its electronic platform. This decision is based on the belief that offering free access to published materials helps to build a greater and better exchange of knowledge.

In turn, for the quarterly edition, CTS allows institutional and thematic repositories, as well as personal web pages, to self-archive articles in their post-print or editorial version, immediately after  the publication of the final version of each issue and under the condition that a link to the original source will be incorporated into the self-archive.

Most read articles by the same author(s)