Social appropriation of science

decision-making and provision of climate services to climate-sensitive sectors in southeastern South America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-617

Keywords:

climate change, climate services, social needs

Abstract

The production of relevant and usable knowledge constitutes a challenge for scientists, bridging in a renewed way the gap between those concerned with society and those concerned with nature. The significant advances of contemporary climate science would expand further if a robust social appropriation of science informed both public and private decision-making. The concept of “climate services” recently adopted by the World Meteorological Organization expresses a new perspective on socio-environmental systems and synthesizes the will to produce climate information and knowledge to match the needs and expectations of different profiles of actors and climate-sensitive sectors. Climate information production is not enough to provide these services. Decision-making requires progress in the appropriation of science by society. Communication among scientists, decision-makers and stakeholders, translation of information into impacts and guidelines for action, exploration of innovative institutional forms become mandatory. After a brief review of discussions and initiatives around the importance of articulating social and environmental knowledge through the consideration of “human dimensions” in the characterization of global change, this article shows how collaboration between natural and social scientists has shifted into interactive and horizontal forms of research. In particular, these considerations are deployed in the characterization of the actions of a multinational, multidisciplinary, collaborative research network that includes stakeholders as peers in the project IAI CRN3035 on climate services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cecilia Hidalgo, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.

Claudia E. Natenzon, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.

References

CARBONE, G. J. (2008): “Decision Support: A Regional-Scale Drought Monitoring Tool for the Carolinas”, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89 (1), pp. 20- 28.

FUNTOWICZ, S. e HIDALGO, C. (2008): “Ciencia y política con la gente en tiempos de incertidumbre, conflicto de intereses e indeterminación”, Apropiación social de la ciencia, Madrid, Editorial Biblioteca Nueva.

FUNTOWICZ, S. y RAVETZ, J. (1992): “Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post normal science”, en S. Krimsky y D. Gloding (eds.): Social Theories of Risk, Londres, Praeger, pp. 251-273.

GARCIA ACOSTA, V. (2006): “Estrategias adaptativas y amenazas climáticas”, en J. Urbina Soria y J. Martínez Fernández, compiladores Más allá del cambio climático. Las dimensiones psicosociales del cambio ambiental global. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales/ INE/ Facultad de Psicología – UNAM, México; pp. 29-46.

GUIMARÃES, R. (2007): “El Programa Internacional sobre Cambio Ambiental Global – IHDP como referente”, en E. Tancredo y N. Da Costa Pereira (coord.) Dimensiones Humanas del Cambio Ambiental en Argentina. Hacia la construcción de una Agenda Científica Ambiental Interinstitucional. Buenos Aires, UNLu; pp. 13-17.

HANSEN, J. W. (2006): “Translating climate forecasts into agricultural terms: advances and challenges”, in Climate Research, 33, pp. 27-41.

HIDALGO, C.; NATENZON, C. E. y PODESTÁ, G. P. (2011): “From enthusiasm to pragmatism: shifting perspectives of success in interdisciplinary research”, in Interciencia, 36 (2), pp. 113-120.

HIGH-LEVEL TASKFORCE FOR THE GLOBAL FRAMEWORK FOR CLIMATE SERVICES (2011): Climate knowledge for action: a global framework for climate services - empowering the vulnerable. Geneva, Switzerland, World Meteorological Organization.

IPCC (2007): Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.). Geneva, Switzerland.

ISSC - HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE PROGRAME (1990): Report of the ISSC Scientific Symposium on The Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Palma de Mallorca, UNESCO, Occasional Papers 1, p. 36.

JACOBSON, H. K. y PRICE, M. F. (1990): A framework for research on the human dimensions of global environmental change. Barcelona, Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme. Disponible en: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu /docs/005-351/005-351.html.

JASANOFF, S. (2004): States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Londres, Routledge.

LEARY, N. (2008): “A Stitch in Time: General Lessons from Specific Cases”, en N. Leary, N. J. Adejuwon, V. Barros, I. Burton, J. Kulkarni, J. y R. Lasco (eds.): Climate Change and Adaptation, Londres-Sterling, Earthscan/Start, pp. 1-27.

LEMOS, M. C. (2002): “The use of seasonal climate forecasting in policymaking: lessons from Northeast Brazil”, in Climatic Change, 55 (4), pp. 479-507.

LEMOS, M. C. y MOREHOUSE, B. J. (2005): “The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments”, Global Environmental Change Part A, 15 (1), pp. 57-68.

LEMPERT, R. J. & GROVES, D. G. (2010): “Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west”, in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77 (6), pp. 960-974.

MARGALEF, R. (1998): Ecología. Barcelona, Omega.

MOONEY, H. A.; DURAIAPPAH, A. y LARIGAUDERIE, A. (2013): “Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs”, PNAS- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, February 26, Vol. 110, suppl. 1, pp. 3665-3672.

NAS - NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (1999): Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change and Committee on Global Change Research, Washington, National Academy Press. Disponible en: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/ 9641.html.

NATENZON, C. E. (2007): “Riesgo, prevención, mitigación y adaptación. Aportes al eje temático sobre Seguridad Humana”, en E. Tancredi y N. Da Costa Pereira (coords.): Dimensiones Humanas del Cambio Ambiental en Argentina. Hacia la construcción de una Agenda Científica Ambiental Interinstitucional, Luján-Buenos Aires, UNLu, pp. 67-73.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2001): A Climate Services Vision: First Steps Toward the Future, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2009): Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate, C.o.t.H.D.o.G.C. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, D.C., The National Academies Press.

PODESTÁ, G.; NATENZON, C. E., HIDALGO, C. y RUIZ TORANZO, F. (2013): “Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: A case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the argentine pampas”, Environmental Science & Policy. ELSEVIER, vol. 26; pp. 40-48.

RIBEIRO, D. (1985): Las Américas y la civilización. Buenos Aires, CEAL. Bibliotecas Universitarias.

SWAMINATHAN, M. S. (2007): “Can science and technology feed the world in 2025?: `Ground-breaking Stuff’”, Proceedings of the 13th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference, Perth, Western Australia, Field Crops Research, 104 (1-3), pp. 3-9.

Downloads

Published

2014-01-30

How to Cite

Hidalgo, C. ., & Natenzon, C. E. (2014). Social appropriation of science: decision-making and provision of climate services to climate-sensitive sectors in southeastern South America. Revista Iberoamericana De Ciencia, Tecnología Y Sociedad - CTS (Ibero-American Science, Technology and Society Journal), 9(25), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-617

Issue

Section

Dossier